PTFE | LiiFoo PTFE – 第 15 页 – LiiFoo

标签: PTFE

  • 新材料关键词日报(2026年7月31日):低空经济点燃碳纤维,湿电子化学品国产替代提速

    核心结论

    • 碳纤维:低空经济2026年被列入新兴支柱产业,eVTOL结构件需求成为碳纤维复材新增长极,关键词热度快速上行。
    • 电子化学品:AI算力驱动先进封装景气,日月光封装报价上调逾20%;韩国东进决定剥离在华湿电子化学品资产,国产替代窗口进一步打开。
    • PEEK:人形机器人进入十万台级量产关键年,轻量化关节与执行器部件带动PEEK等高端工程塑料需求预期。
    • PTFE:山东悬浮中粒报价31800元/吨,30天区间30000–48000元/吨;高纯度、精密加工件为增长最快细分,行业年复合增速约8%。
    • 特种陶瓷:碳化硅衬底2025年全球市场11.8亿美元,预计2032年突破50亿美元,CAGR超25%;半导体设备用陶瓷部件需求同步走强。
    • 气凝胶:住建《面向”好房子”建设好材料选用指南》收录气凝胶隔热涂料系统,建筑节能成为动力电池隔热片之外的第二增长曲线。

    关键词热度与竞争度评估

    关键词 热度 竞争度 趋势 商业价值
    低空经济碳纤维 ↑↑ 高:政策驱动叠加eVTOL放量前夜
    湿电子化学品国产替代 中高 高:外资退出+先进封装涨价共振
    人形机器人PEEK 中高 ↑↑ 高:量产元年,材料选型窗口期
    高纯PTFE精密件 →↑ 中高:半导体/医疗刚需,溢价能力强
    碳化硅衬底 中:赛道拥挤但长尾配套仍有空间
    气凝胶隔热涂料 低中 中高:建筑端新标准打开增量

    分材料动态

    1. 碳纤维:低空经济从概念到拼材料

    行业媒体聚焦”低空经济开始拼材料”,碳纤维、电池与安全体系被列为最先受益方向。政策连续三年加码(2024写入政府工作报告→2026列入新兴支柱产业),eVTOL机体结构件、螺旋桨、电池箱体均为碳纤维复材高价值场景。建议围绕”低空经济+碳纤维”组合词提前布局内容。

    2. 电子化学品:外资收缩,国产提速

    韩国东进剥离在华湿电子化学品资产,本土厂商份额有望加速提升;CoWoS-L预计2027年占先进封装70%,带动环氧塑封料、湿电子化学品、电子特气需求扩容。B2B获客侧,”湿电子化学品供应商””电子级化学品认证”等采购型关键词转化价值高。

    3. PEEK与人形机器人

    智元启动赴港上市,2026年被视为人形机器人规模化部署元年,十万台级量产预期下,PEEK在关节、齿轮、轻量化结构件上的替代金属逻辑被反复验证。关注”机器人PEEK齿轮””PEEK 3D打印”等长尾词。

    4. PTFE:价格企稳,高端分化

    PTFE当前报价31800元/吨,处于30天区间下沿附近,通用料竞争激烈;但高纯度、精密加工件(半导体阀门、密封件)细分维持约8%复合增长,是内容与获客的差异化切入点。

    5. 特种陶瓷:SiC链条高景气外溢

    SiC衬底市场CAGR超25%,同时半导体设备用氮化硅/氧化铝/碳化硅陶瓷结构件(陶瓷环、吸盘、喷嘴)需求走强,加工难度构筑壁垒,属于”高毛利+低内容竞争”象限。

    6. 气凝胶:建筑端标准化利好

    《面向”好房子”建设好材料选用指南》将气凝胶隔热涂料系统纳入围护结构材料专篇,标准背书降低推广门槛;动力电池隔热片仍是当前出货主力。

    行动建议

    1. 本周优先产出”低空经济碳纤维复合材料”专题内容,抢占政策热度窗口。
    2. 针对湿电子化学品,制作”国产替代选型对比”类采购决策内容,承接东进退出带来的搜索流量。
    3. PEEK内容绑定人形机器人场景词,避开泛词竞争。

  • Trade Show Opportunity Scan (2026-07-30): Sep-Oct Peak Window — CAMX & Shanghai CIIF Lead

    2026-07-30 Industry Trade Show Opportunity Scan

    This scan covers global exhibitions in the next 3-6 months (Aug 2026 – Jan 2027) across four segments: PTFE/fluoropolymers, PEEK/specialty engineering plastics, carbon fiber composites, and advanced ceramics. Bottom line: September-October is the peak exhibition window. Top domestic picks: CIIF New Materials Show + TFE China (October, co-located in Shanghai). Top overseas pick: CAMX 2026 (September, North America’s largest composites expo).

    1. Upcoming Exhibitions

    Exhibition Dates Location Scale Value
    China Composites Expo (CCE 2026) Sep 1-3, 2026 NECC, Shanghai Asia’s largest composites show, 31-year history ★★★★★ Full carbon fiber value chain buyers
    CAMX 2026 Sep 21-24, 2026 Atlanta, USA North America’s largest; ACMA + SAMPE ★★★★★ Aerospace & wind energy buyers
    PLASTIC EXPO TOKYO Sep 30 – Oct 2, 2026 Tokyo, Japan ~1,200 exhibitors, ~59,000 visitors ★★★★ Strong PEEK / metal-replacement demand
    TFE China 2026 (PTFE Products & Materials) Oct 12-16, 2026 NECC, Shanghai Co-located with CIIF New Materials ★★★★★ Vertical PTFE show with cross traffic
    CIIF New Materials Show Oct 12-16, 2026 NECC, Shanghai CIIF: 2,600+ exhibitors, 200k visitors ★★★★★ National-level platform, strong branding
    China International Plastics Exhibition Oct 28-30, 2026 Nanjing, China 7th edition, hosted by CPPIA ★★★ Engineering plastics, domestic channels
    Ceramics 2026 Conference Sep 14-15, 2026 Rome, Italy Academic conference ★★★ Technology trends & networking
    Shanghai Int’l Fluoroplastics Industry Expo Dec 9-11, 2026 SNIEC, Shanghai Co-located with semiconductor expo ★★★★ Fluoropolymer x semiconductor crossover
    Shanghai Petrochemical Anti-Corrosion Materials Expo Dec 9-11, 2026 SNIEC, Shanghai 6th edition ★★★ End users of PTFE linings & seals

    2. Top Recommendations

    • CAMX 2026 (September, Atlanta): The premier advanced materials event in North America with high-quality aerospace, automotive and wind energy buyers — ideal for export-oriented carbon fiber / composites companies. Action: contact ACMA or a China booth agent this week to secure remaining space; start US visa processing now (allow 2 months).
    • CIIF New Materials + TFE China (October, Shanghai): Two co-located shows in one venue — general new-materials buyers plus vertical PTFE buyers in a single trip. Best cost-performance of the year. Action: lock in booths before mid-August for early-bird rates; prepare a combined fluoropolymer + specialty plastics exhibit.
    • PLASTIC EXPO TOKYO (late September): Clear Japanese demand for PEEK and lightweight metal replacement with high order value. Action: if budget is tight, attend as a visitor and pre-book meetings with automotive and medical device Tier-1 suppliers.

    3. Registration Deadlines

    • September shows (CCE, CAMX, Tokyo): booth sales are closing — decide within this week, otherwise waitlist or visitor-only.
    • October CIIF / TFE China: booking typically closes ~45 days before opening (late August); sign by Aug 15 for early-bird pricing.
    • December Shanghai Fluoroplastics Expo: ample space remains; decide by Sep-Oct.

    4. Cost Estimates (Reference)

    • Domestic (China): standard booth RMB 12,000-18,000 per 9 sqm; raw space RMB 1,200-1,800/sqm; full cost per show (3 staff incl. build & travel) approx. RMB 50,000-100,000.
    • CAMX (USA): booth from ~$4,500-6,000 per 9 sqm; total with build, logistics and travel for 3 staff approx. RMB 250,000-400,000.
    • Tokyo: booth approx. RMB 80,000-120,000 per 9 sqm; total budget RMB 150,000-250,000; visitor-only trip ~RMB 20,000-30,000 per person.

    Note: figures are market reference ranges; final organizer quotations prevail. Suggested H2 allocation: one flagship overseas show + two domestic shows.

  • 2026-07-30 行业展会机会扫描:9-10月参展窗口密集,CAMX与上海工博会双主线

    2026-07-30 行业展会机会扫描

    本期扫描未来3-6个月(2026年8月-2027年1月)全球高性能材料相关展会,覆盖PTFE/氟塑料、PEEK/特种工程塑料、碳纤维复合材料、先进陶瓷四大方向。结论先行:9-10月是本年度参展窗口密集期,国内首推上海工博会新材料展+TFE China(10月,同馆联动),海外首推美国CAMX(9月,北美最大复材展)。

    一、即将举办展会一览

    展会名称 时间 地点 规模 参展价值
    中国国际复合材料工业技术展(CCE 2026) 2026.9.1-3 上海·国家会展中心 亚洲最大复材展,办展31年 ★★★★★ 碳纤维全产业链买家集中
    CAMX 2026 美国复合材料及先进材料展 2026.9.21-24 美国·亚特兰大 北美最大,ACMA+SAMPE联合主办 ★★★★★ 对接航空航天、风电高端客户
    PLASTIC EXPO TOKYO 高性能塑料展 2026.9.30-10.2 日本·东京 约1200家展商、5.9万观众 ★★★★ PEEK/金属替代方案需求旺盛
    TFE China 2026 上海国际聚四氟乙烯展 2026.10.12-16 上海·国家会展中心 与工博会新材料展同期 ★★★★★ PTFE行业垂直展,同期客流叠加
    中国工博会新材料产业展 2026.10.12-16 上海·国家会展中心 工博会2600+展商、20万观众 ★★★★★ 国家级平台,品牌背书强
    中国国际塑料展 2026.10.28-30 南京国际博览中心 中塑协主办,第七届 ★★★ 工程塑料改性、内销渠道
    Ceramics 2026 国际陶瓷与复材会议 2026.9.14-15 意大利·罗马 学术型会议 ★★★ 技术交流、前沿风向
    上海国际氟塑料产业链展 2026.12.9-11 上海新国际博览中心 同期半导体展 ★★★★ 氟材料+半导体应用交叉客户
    上海国际石化耐腐蚀材料及设备展 2026.12.9-11 上海新国际博览中心 第六届 ★★★ PTFE衬里、密封件终端用户集中

    二、重点推荐

    • CAMX 2026(9月,亚特兰大):北美先进材料第一展,航空航天、汽车、风电买家质量高,适合出口型碳纤维/复材企业建立北美渠道。行动建议:立即联系ACMA或国内组展代理确认剩余展位,同步办理美签(预留2个月)。
    • 工博会新材料展 + TFE China(10月,上海):两展同期同馆,一次参展覆盖新材料综合买家+PTFE垂直买家,性价比全年最高。行动建议:8月中旬前锁定展位可争取早鸟价;提前策划”氟材料+特种工程塑料”联合展品方案。
    • PLASTIC EXPO TOKYO(9月底,东京):日本市场对PEEK、轻量化金属替代需求明确,客单价高。行动建议:若预算有限可先以观展+客户拜访形式切入,重点约见汽车与医疗器械Tier1。

    三、报名提醒

    • 9月展会(CCE、CAMX、东京展):展位销售已进入尾声,本周内必须决策,逾期只能候补或观展。
    • 10月工博会/TFE China:展位预订截止一般在开展前45天左右(约8月底),早鸟优惠更早,建议8月15日前签约。
    • 12月上海氟塑料展:仍有较充裕展位,9-10月决策即可。

    四、成本估算(参考)

    • 国内展:标摊约¥12,000-18,000/9㎡;光地约¥1,200-1,800/㎡;单展全程(3人,含搭建差旅)预算约¥5-10万。
    • 美国CAMX:展位约$4,500-6,000/9㎡起,加上搭建、物流、3人差旅,总预算约¥25-40万。
    • 东京展:展位约¥8-12万/9㎡,含差旅总预算约¥15-25万;纯观展拜访约¥2-3万/人。

    注:费用为市场参考区间,以主办方最终报价为准。建议按”1场海外主展+2场国内展”配置下半年参展预算。

  • POM vs PA66: 哪种材料更适合你的应用?工程塑料选型对比指南(2026)

    结论先行:如果你的零件长期接触水或需要极佳的尺寸稳定性与低摩擦,选 POM(聚甲醛);如果零件承受高温、冲击载荷或需要更高的机械强度,选 PA66(尼龙66)。两者价格接近,选错材料的代价远高于材料本身的差价。

    一、材料特性对比表

    特性 POM(均聚/共聚) PA66(尼龙66)
    密度 (g/cm³) 1.41–1.42 1.13–1.15
    拉伸强度 (MPa, ISO 527) 60–70 75–85(干态)/ 50–60(吸湿后)
    弯曲模量 (GPa) 2.6–3.1 2.8–3.3(干态)/ 1.2–1.5(吸湿后)
    缺口冲击强度 (kJ/m², ISO 179) 6–9 5–7(干态)/ 15–20(吸湿后)
    热变形温度 HDT 1.8MPa (°C) 95–110 70–90(干态)/ 玻纤增强后 240+
    长期使用温度 (°C) -40 至 100 -40 至 120(干态)
    吸水率 24h (%, ISO 62) 0.2–0.25 1.0–1.5(饱和吸湿可达 8%)
    摩擦系数(对钢) 0.20–0.32 0.30–0.40
    成型收缩率 (%) 1.8–2.2 0.8–1.5

    数据来源:ISO 527 / ISO 179 / ISO 75 标准测试条件下的典型牌号数据(如杜邦 Delrin 500P、奥升德 Vydyne、巴斯夫 Ultramid A3K),实际采购时以供应商 TDS 为准。

    二、性能差异的本质

    吸湿性是两者最大的分水岭。PA66 分子链中的酰胺基团亲水,饱和吸湿后拉伸强度下降约 30%,尺寸膨胀 0.5%–2%,但冲击韧性反而提升 2–3 倍。POM 吸水率仅为 PA66 的 1/5,在潮湿环境中尺寸几乎不变,这也是精密齿轮、卡扣件首选 POM 的核心原因。

    耐热性方面 PA66 上限更高。玻纤增强 PA66(如 PA66-GF30)的 HDT 可达 240°C 以上,广泛用于发动机周边件;POM 超过 110°C 后强度快速衰减,且加工温度窗口窄(超过 230°C 易分解释放甲醛),不适合高温场景。

    耐化学性各有侧重。POM 耐有机溶剂、燃油优异,但不耐强酸(pH<4 慎用);PA66 耐碱、耐油性好,但会被氯化钙、氯化锌等盐溶液应力开裂——汽车底盘件在融雪剂环境失效多与此有关。

    三、应用场景分析

    • 优选 POM:精密齿轮、轴承保持架、卡扣与滑轨、水暖阀件、食品输送链板、燃油系统浮子。关键词:低摩擦、耐磨、尺寸稳定、接触水。
    • 优选 PA66:汽车进气歧管、散热风扇、发动机罩盖、电动工具外壳、扎带、高铁轨道绝缘件。关键词:耐高温、抗冲击、可玻纤增强。
    • 两者皆可:普通结构件、家电内部件——此时按成型工艺和成本决定。

    四、成本效益评估

    项目 POM PA66
    2026年通用级市场价 (元/吨) 11,000–14,000 16,000–20,000
    玻纤增强级 (元/吨) 14,000–17,000(GF25) 18,000–23,000(GF30)
    密度成本影响 密度高 25%,单件材料用量更多 密度低,同体积零件更省料
    加工成本 收缩率大需精密模具补偿 需干燥处理(含水<0.2%),能耗略高

    注意:PA66 价格受己二腈供应影响波动大(2021年曾暴涨至 4 万元/吨),签订长单时建议约定原料联动条款;POM 价格相对平稳。按单件成本计算,PA66 虽然吨价高,但密度低 20%,实际单件差价往往小于吨价差异。

    五、选型建议

    1. 接触水/潮湿环境 + 精密配合 → POM,不要犹豫。
    2. 使用温度长期高于 100°C → PA66(优先玻纤增强牌号)。
    3. 滑动摩擦件 → POM;若需进一步降摩擦,选含 PTFE 改性牌号。
    4. 承受冲击或振动载荷 → PA66,吸湿后韧性优势明显。
    5. 接触融雪剂/无机盐环境 → 避开 PA66,改用 POM 或 PA12。
    6. 批量采购前务必索取 TDS 和批次 COA,并按 ISO 294 标准样条复测关键指标;对进口替代牌号,建议先做 500–1000 件小批量装机验证。

    行动建议:把你的工况按”温度、湿度、载荷、介质”四个维度列表,对照上文对比表打分,80% 的选型争议可以在 10 分钟内解决。拿不准时,向供应商同时索取两种材料的样品进行对比测试——样品是免费的,装机失败是昂贵的。

  • POM vs PA66: Which Material Is Better for Your Application? Engineering Plastics Comparison Guide (2026)

    Bottom line first: If your part is in long-term contact with water or demands excellent dimensional stability and low friction, choose POM (polyoxymethylene / acetal). If the part faces high temperatures, impact loads, or needs higher mechanical strength, choose PA66 (nylon 66). Their prices are close — the cost of choosing the wrong material far exceeds the price difference between them.

    1. Material Property Comparison Table

    Property POM (homo/copolymer) PA66 (Nylon 66)
    Density (g/cm³) 1.41–1.42 1.13–1.15
    Tensile strength (MPa, ISO 527) 60–70 75–85 (dry) / 50–60 (conditioned)
    Flexural modulus (GPa) 2.6–3.1 2.8–3.3 (dry) / 1.2–1.5 (conditioned)
    Notched impact strength (kJ/m², ISO 179) 6–9 5–7 (dry) / 15–20 (conditioned)
    HDT @1.8MPa (°C) 95–110 70–90 (dry) / 240+ glass-filled
    Continuous use temperature (°C) -40 to 100 -40 to 120 (dry)
    Water absorption 24h (%, ISO 62) 0.2–0.25 1.0–1.5 (up to 8% at saturation)
    Coefficient of friction (vs steel) 0.20–0.32 0.30–0.40
    Molding shrinkage (%) 1.8–2.2 0.8–1.5

    Data source: typical grade values under ISO 527 / ISO 179 / ISO 75 test conditions (e.g., DuPont Delrin 500P, Ascend Vydyne, BASF Ultramid A3K). Always verify against the supplier’s TDS before purchasing.

    2. The Essence of the Performance Difference

    Moisture absorption is the biggest dividing line. The amide groups in PA66 are hydrophilic: at moisture saturation, tensile strength drops about 30% and dimensions swell 0.5%–2%, while impact toughness increases 2–3x. POM absorbs only 1/5 as much water, keeping dimensions virtually unchanged in humid environments — the core reason precision gears and snap-fits default to POM.

    PA66 has the higher thermal ceiling. Glass-filled PA66 (e.g., PA66-GF30) reaches an HDT above 240°C and is widely used around engines. POM loses strength rapidly above 110°C and has a narrow processing window (it decomposes and releases formaldehyde above ~230°C), making it unsuitable for hot environments.

    Chemical resistance differs by direction. POM resists organic solvents and fuels well but not strong acids (avoid below pH 4). PA66 resists alkalis and oils, but suffers stress cracking in calcium chloride or zinc chloride solutions — many chassis part failures in de-icing salt environments trace back to this.

    3. Application Scenario Analysis

    • Choose POM: precision gears, bearing cages, snap-fits and slide rails, plumbing valve parts, food conveyor chain plates, fuel system floats. Keywords: low friction, wear resistance, dimensional stability, water contact.
    • Choose PA66: automotive intake manifolds, cooling fans, engine covers, power tool housings, cable ties, rail insulation parts. Keywords: heat resistance, impact resistance, glass-fiber reinforceable.
    • Either works: general structural parts and appliance internals — decide by processing and cost.

    4. Cost-Benefit Assessment

    Item POM PA66
    2026 general-grade market price (USD/ton) 1,550–1,950 2,250–2,800
    Glass-filled grade (USD/ton) 1,950–2,400 (GF25) 2,500–3,200 (GF30)
    Density impact on cost 25% denser — more material per part Lower density — less material per part volume
    Processing cost High shrinkage requires precise mold compensation Requires drying (moisture <0.2%), slightly higher energy

    Note: PA66 pricing is volatile due to adiponitrile supply (it spiked sharply in 2021). For long-term contracts, negotiate raw-material indexation clauses; POM pricing is comparatively stable. On a per-part basis, PA66’s 20% lower density often narrows the real cost gap well below the per-ton difference.

    5. Selection Recommendations

    1. Water/humid environment + precision fit → POM. No hesitation.
    2. Continuous service above 100°C → PA66 (prefer glass-filled grades).
    3. Sliding friction parts → POM; for even lower friction, choose PTFE-modified grades.
    4. Impact or vibration loads → PA66 — its toughness advantage after conditioning is significant.
    5. Exposure to de-icing salts / inorganic salts → avoid PA66; use POM or PA12 instead.
    6. Before volume purchase, request TDS and batch COA, retest key properties per ISO 294 specimens, and run a 500–1,000 piece pilot validation for import-substitute grades.

    Action advice: List your operating conditions across four dimensions — temperature, humidity, load, and media — then score them against the comparison table above. 80% of selection debates resolve in 10 minutes. When in doubt, request free samples of both materials for side-by-side testing: samples are free, field failures are expensive.

  • POM vs PA66: Qual Material É Melhor para a Sua Aplicação? Guia Comparativo de Plásticos de Engenharia (2026)

    Conclusão primeiro: Se a sua peça fica em contato prolongado com água ou exige excelente estabilidade dimensional e baixo atrito, escolha POM (poliacetal). Se a peça enfrenta altas temperaturas, cargas de impacto ou precisa de maior resistência mecânica, escolha PA66 (náilon 66). Os preços são próximos — o custo de escolher o material errado supera em muito a diferença de preço entre eles.

    1. Tabela Comparativa de Propriedades

    Propriedade POM (homo/copolímero) PA66 (Náilon 66)
    Densidade (g/cm³) 1,41–1,42 1,13–1,15
    Resistência à tração (MPa, ISO 527) 60–70 75–85 (seco) / 50–60 (condicionado)
    Módulo de flexão (GPa) 2,6–3,1 2,8–3,3 (seco) / 1,2–1,5 (condicionado)
    Impacto com entalhe (kJ/m², ISO 179) 6–9 5–7 (seco) / 15–20 (condicionado)
    HDT @1,8MPa (°C) 95–110 70–90 (seco) / 240+ com fibra de vidro
    Temperatura de uso contínuo (°C) -40 a 100 -40 a 120 (seco)
    Absorção de água 24h (%, ISO 62) 0,2–0,25 1,0–1,5 (até 8% na saturação)
    Coeficiente de atrito (contra aço) 0,20–0,32 0,30–0,40
    Contração de moldagem (%) 1,8–2,2 0,8–1,5

    Fonte dos dados: valores típicos de grades comerciais em condições de teste ISO 527 / ISO 179 / ISO 75 (ex.: DuPont Delrin 500P, Ascend Vydyne, BASF Ultramid A3K). Sempre confirme com o TDS do fornecedor antes de comprar.

    2. A Essência da Diferença de Desempenho

    A absorção de umidade é o maior divisor de águas. Os grupos amida do PA66 são hidrofílicos: na saturação, a resistência à tração cai cerca de 30% e as dimensões incham 0,5%–2%, enquanto a tenacidade ao impacto aumenta 2–3 vezes. O POM absorve apenas 1/5 da água, mantendo as dimensões praticamente inalteradas em ambientes úmidos — a razão central pela qual engrenagens de precisão e encaixes rápidos preferem POM.

    O PA66 tem teto térmico mais alto. O PA66 com fibra de vidro (ex.: PA66-GF30) atinge HDT acima de 240°C e é amplamente usado em componentes próximos ao motor. O POM perde resistência rapidamente acima de 110°C e tem janela de processamento estreita (decompõe-se liberando formaldeído acima de ~230°C), sendo inadequado para ambientes quentes.

    A resistência química varia por tipo de meio. O POM resiste bem a solventes orgânicos e combustíveis, mas não a ácidos fortes (evite abaixo de pH 4). O PA66 resiste a álcalis e óleos, mas sofre fissuração sob tensão em soluções de cloreto de cálcio ou zinco — muitas falhas de peças de chassi em ambientes com sal de degelo têm essa origem.

    3. Análise de Cenários de Aplicação

    • Prefira POM: engrenagens de precisão, gaiolas de rolamento, encaixes e trilhos deslizantes, componentes de válvulas hidráulicas, placas de correntes transportadoras de alimentos, boias de sistemas de combustível. Palavras-chave: baixo atrito, resistência ao desgaste, estabilidade dimensional, contato com água.
    • Prefira PA66: coletores de admissão automotivos, ventiladores de arrefecimento, tampas de motor, carcaças de ferramentas elétricas, abraçadeiras, peças isolantes ferroviárias. Palavras-chave: resistência ao calor, resistência ao impacto, reforçável com fibra de vidro.
    • Ambos funcionam: peças estruturais comuns e componentes internos de eletrodomésticos — decida pelo processo e pelo custo.

    4. Avaliação Custo-Benefício

    Item POM PA66
    Preço de mercado grau geral 2026 (USD/ton) 1.550–1.950 2.250–2.800
    Grau com fibra de vidro (USD/ton) 1.950–2.400 (GF25) 2.500–3.200 (GF30)
    Impacto da densidade no custo 25% mais denso — mais material por peça Menor densidade — menos material por volume
    Custo de processamento Alta contração exige compensação precisa do molde Exige secagem (umidade <0,2%), energia ligeiramente maior

    Nota: o preço do PA66 é volátil devido ao fornecimento de adiponitrila (disparou em 2021). Em contratos de longo prazo, negocie cláusulas de indexação de matéria-prima; o preço do POM é comparativamente estável. Por peça, a densidade 20% menor do PA66 frequentemente reduz a diferença real de custo bem abaixo da diferença por tonelada.

    5. Recomendações de Seleção

    1. Ambiente úmido/água + ajuste de precisão → POM. Sem hesitação.
    2. Serviço contínuo acima de 100°C → PA66 (prefira grades com fibra de vidro).
    3. Peças de atrito deslizante → POM; para atrito ainda menor, escolha grades modificadas com PTFE.
    4. Cargas de impacto ou vibração → PA66 — sua vantagem de tenacidade após condicionamento é significativa.
    5. Exposição a sais de degelo / sais inorgânicos → evite PA66; use POM ou PA12.
    6. Antes da compra em volume, solicite TDS e COA do lote, reteste as propriedades-chave em corpos de prova ISO 294 e faça validação piloto de 500–1.000 peças para grades substitutas de importação.

    Conselho prático: Liste suas condições de operação em quatro dimensões — temperatura, umidade, carga e meio — e pontue-as contra a tabela comparativa acima. 80% dos debates de seleção se resolvem em 10 minutos. Em caso de dúvida, solicite amostras gratuitas dos dois materiais para testes lado a lado: amostras são gratuitas, falhas em campo são caras.

  • PEEK in Semiconductor Manufacturing FAQ (2026): Purity, Plasma Resistance and Grade Selection Answered

    PEEK (polyetheretherketone) has become a workhorse polymer in semiconductor fabs, from wafer handling to wet-bench hardware. Below are the questions engineers and buyers ask us most often, answered concisely.

    1. Why is PEEK so widely used in semiconductor equipment?

    Three reasons: thermal stability, chemical resistance, and cleanliness. PEEK maintains mechanical integrity at continuous service temperatures up to 240°C, resists most process chemistries used in wet cleaning and etching, and can be produced in high-purity grades with very low ionic contamination. It also machines to tight tolerances, which matters for wafer carriers, CMP retaining rings, test sockets, and vacuum chamber components.

    2. What does “semiconductor-grade” PEEK actually mean?

    There is no single industry-wide certificate. In practice, semiconductor-grade means the resin and finished parts are controlled for extractable metal ions (typically Na, K, Fe, Cu, Ca measured in ppb), low outgassing, and low particle generation. Suppliers such as Solvay (KetaSpire), Victrex, and Mitsubishi Chemical offer grades marketed for electronics with supporting purity data. Always request the ionic extraction report for the specific lot, not just a generic datasheet.

    3. How does PEEK perform against plasma exposure?

    Unfilled PEEK offers moderate plasma resistance. In oxygen-rich or fluorine-rich plasmas it will erode faster than ceramics or fluoropolymer alternatives, so it is normally kept out of direct plasma line-of-sight. For chamber applications, PEEK is typically used for structural or insulating parts shielded from the plasma, while quartz, alumina, or Y2O3-coated components take the direct exposure.

    4. Is carbon-fiber-filled or unfilled PEEK better for wafer handling?

    It depends on the contamination budget. Carbon-filled grades give higher stiffness, better creep resistance, and controlled static dissipation (surface resistivity in the 104–109 ohm range for ESD grades), which is why they dominate in test sockets and robot end effectors. However, fiber-filled parts can shed particles at machined edges. For front-end, particle-critical positions, many fabs specify unfilled high-purity PEEK or ESD grades based on dissipative additives rather than chopped carbon fiber.

    5. What temperatures can PEEK parts survive in a fab?

    Glass transition is around 143°C and melting around 343°C. Continuous use up to about 240°C is realistic for load-bearing parts; short excursions higher are possible with reduced mechanical load. For hotter zones, engineers usually step up to polyimide-based or ceramic solutions.

    6. How does PEEK handle wet process chemistries?

    PEEK resists most acids, bases, and solvents used in cleaning baths, including dilute HF, SC-1 and SC-2 solutions, and IPA. The main exception is concentrated sulfuric acid and some hot oxidizing mixtures such as piranha solution, which attack PEEK. For those baths, PTFE, PFA, or PVDF hardware remains the standard choice.

    7. What about outgassing in vacuum tools?

    Properly dried PEEK shows low outgassing, dominated by absorbed moisture. Baking parts before installation (typically 120–150°C under vacuum) brings total mass loss well within limits for most transfer chambers. For extreme UHV applications, verify with ASTM E595 data on the specific grade.

    8. How should I qualify a PEEK parts supplier?

    Ask for: (1) resin traceability to the original polymer producer and grade; (2) lot-level ionic purity and outgassing data if the application is contamination-sensitive; (3) machining capability statements covering burr control and cleanroom-compatible final cleaning and packaging; (4) dimensional inspection reports. Beware of quotes based on unspecified “PEEK equivalent” resin—recycled or off-spec material is a recurring problem in low-cost supply chains.

    9. Is machined or injection-molded PEEK better for semiconductor parts?

    Machined stock shapes dominate for low-volume, high-precision parts such as CMP rings and chamber insulators, because annealed extruded rod and plate offer consistent crystallinity and low internal stress. Injection molding becomes economical for high-volume items like test socket housings, provided the tool design controls flow-induced fiber orientation and warpage.

    10. What is the typical price range in 2026?

    Unfilled general-purpose PEEK resin trades roughly at USD 55–75/kg, while verified high-purity electronic grades and ESD compounds command significant premiums, often 1.5–3x. Finished precision parts are priced by machining complexity rather than resin weight, so request quotes against drawings early in the design cycle.

    Have a question we did not cover? Contact our technical team for grade selection support and supplier benchmarking in the China market.

  • New Materials Price Trend Daily Report – July 30, 2026

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin

    $block =

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin | PEEK Resin | Carbon Fiber | PI Film | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials


    1. Price Overview

    | Material | Current Price Range | WoW Change | Trend |

    |———-|——————-|————|——-|

    | PTFE Resin (Suspension Medium) | ¥30,000–48,000 /ton | -2.1% | ↘ Bearish |

    | PTFE Dispersion Resin | ¥60,000–65,000 /ton | -1.5% | ↘ Soft |

    | PEEK Resin (Domestic Ind. Grade) | ¥400–500 /kg | Flat | → Stable |

    | PEEK Resin (Imported Ind. Grade) | ¥800–1,000 /kg | Flat | → Stalemate |

    | Carbon Fiber (T300/24K) | ¥75–85 /kg | +1.2% | ↗ Bottom Bounce |

    | Carbon Fiber (T700/12K) | ¥120–150 /kg | +0.8% | ↗ Stabilizing |

    | PI Film (Electronic Grade) | ¥1,000,000–3,000,000 /ton | Flat | → Firm |

    | Alumina (≥98.5%) | ¥2,800–3,200 /ton | +0.5% | ↗ Slight Rise |

    | Silicon Carbide (88%) | ¥5,500–6,500 /ton | Flat | → Range-bound |


    2. Key Price Movements

    2.1 PTFE Resin — Extended Weakness, Approaching Cycle Floor

    Price: Suspension medium-grade at ¥31,800/ton (Shandong), near the 30-day low of ¥30,000/ton

    WoW: -2.1%, extending the downtrend

    Key Drivers:

    Supply: A new Shandong production line came online mid-July; industry operating rate is low but inventory remains elevated, sustaining oversupply pressure

    Demand: Downstream chemicals and food packaging sectors are in a procurement slump, dominated by small spot orders with no sign of recovery

    Cost: Fluorite and hydrofluoric acid remain elevated (~¥3,781/ton for fluorite), providing cost support but insufficient to lift prices

    Outlook: Already near cash cost floor for some producers — further downside is limited. Near-term: weak consolidation

    2.2 Carbon Fiber — Early Bottom-Reversal Signal

    Price: T300/24K East China ¥75/kg; T700/12K ¥120–150/kg

    WoW: +1.2%, first positive weekly reading in 6 months

    Key Drivers:

    Policy Tailwind: Low-altitude economy (eVTOL/UAVs) formally included in China’s “15th Five-Year Plan,” significantly boosting demand expectations for structural lightweight materials

    Supply Discipline: After 12+ months of losses, smaller producers are cutting output, leading to marginal supply contraction

    Export Strength: H1 2026 carbon fiber exports posted notable YoY growth, with overseas demand outpacing expectations

    Outlook: Bottom established, but oversupply not yet fundamentally resolved — upside capped by high inventory. T700+ fine-denier grades to lead the recovery

    2.3 PI Film — High Ground Holds, Bullish Structure Intact

    Price: Electronic-grade PI film ¥1–3 million/ton (significant variation by thickness and spec)

    WoW: Flat

    Key Drivers:

    Structural Supply Deficit: High-end PI film remains heavily import-dependent (DuPont, UBE, Kaneka, SK Kolon); domestic substitution still in early stages with limited supply elasticity

    Demand Acceleration: Semiconductor packaging, flexible displays, and 5G high-frequency communications continue to scale, with demand growing at 15%+ annually

    Tech Barrier: Global production capacity concentrated among a handful of players — no large-scale new effective capacity coming online short-term

    Outlook: Dominant supply-demand structure intact. High-end grades remain on an upward trajectory; lead times extended

    2.4 PEEK Resin — Domestic Expansion Pressuring Imported Prices

    Price: Domestic ind. grade ¥400–500/kg; imported Victrex-grade ¥800–1,000/kg

    WoW: Flat; imported prices showing marginal softening

    Key Drivers:

    Capacity Buildout: Zhongyan Materials and Junhua Special Plastics continue expanding domestic capacity, narrowing the price gap with imports

    Demand Segmentation: Standard industrial grade supply-demand loosening; medical/aerospace grades hold firm due to certification barriers

    Outlook: Standard industrial PEEK entering a downward cycle. Lock in aerospace/medical-grade suppliers via annual contracts

    2.5 Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials — Mild Cost-Push Uplift

    Price: Alumina ≥98.5% at ¥2,800–3,200/ton; SiC 88% at ¥5,500–6,500/ton

    WoW: Alumina +0.5%; others flat

    Key Drivers:

    – Alumina rise driven by bauxite cost pressure; SiC capped by stable silicon feedstock prices

    – Downstream advanced ceramics demand grows steadily, but raw material sector shows only modest upward movement

    Outlook: Cost-push driven modest uptick. Expect steady-to-slightly-higher prices in August


    3. Impact Analysis

    3.1 Procurement Cost Impact

    | Material | Current Impact | Near-Term Outlook |

    |———-|—————|——————-|

    | PTFE Resin | Low-cost procurement window open; short-term costs manageable | Limited further downside — consider opportunistic restocking |

    | PEEK (Industrial Grade) | Domestic grades expanding cost advantage | Prioritize domestic sources for industrial applications; save 20–30% |

    | Carbon Fiber | Historically low cost environment for T300 | Bottom signal emerging — lock in T700 on 3–6 month terms |

    | PI Film | High-cost item — advance volume commitment advised | Tight supply — place orders 3 months ahead of need |

    | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials | Mild cost increase; limited impact | Hold 2–3 week inventory; no need for large-scale stockpiling |

    3.2 Supply Chain Impact

    PTFE: Oversupply enhances buyer leverage, but low prices may unlock new substitution applications

    Carbon Fiber: Bottom-reversal expectations may trigger a round of strategic restocking; logistics throughput likely to improve

    PI Film / PEEK: High-end grades remain import-dependent — monitor FX and geopolitical logistics risks

    Specialty Ceramics: Rising domestic capacity improves supply chain autonomy over time


    4. Actionable Recommendations

    ✅ Materials to Lock In Now

    1. Carbon Fiber (T700/12K): Bottom-reversal signal confirmed; low-altitude economy demand set to accelerate. Lock in 3–6 month forward contracts to secure pricing

    2. PI Film (Electronic Grade): Supply deficit persists through Q3. Secure supplier配额 in advance, especially for semiconductor/flexible display end-markets

    3. PEEK (Aerospace / Medical Grade): Long qualification cycles and limited suppliers. Sign annual framework agreements with preferred vendors

    ⏳ Materials to Monitor

    1. PTFE Resin (Suspension / Dispersion): Still in downtrend cycle but near cost floor. Wait 2–4 weeks for confirmed stabilization before bulk purchasing

    2. Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials: Modest fluctuations — maintain 2–3 week stock. No need for large inventory buildup


    5. Macro Signals to Watch

    Crude Oil: WTI at ~$79–84/bbl — sharp decline in late July as Mideast geopolitical risk eases; petrochemical cost support weakening

    Fluorite / Hydrofluoric Acid: Remain elevated — PTFE cost floor intact but limited upside for producers

    FX: RMB appreciation would reduce landed costs of imported materials (PI film, PEEK, specialty carbon fiber grades)


    This report is compiled from publicly available market data for reference only. Procurement decisions should factor in your organization’s inventory position, payment terms, and supplier relationships.

    Market Intelligence Officer | New Materials Price Trend Monitoring
    Date: July 30, 2026

    .Value

    $lines = $block -split ‘\r?\n’ | Where-Object {

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin | PEEK Resin | Carbon Fiber | PI Film | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials


    1. Price Overview

    | Material | Current Price Range | WoW Change | Trend |

    |———-|——————-|————|——-|

    | PTFE Resin (Suspension Medium) | ¥30,000–48,000 /ton | -2.1% | ↘ Bearish |

    | PTFE Dispersion Resin | ¥60,000–65,000 /ton | -1.5% | ↘ Soft |

    | PEEK Resin (Domestic Ind. Grade) | ¥400–500 /kg | Flat | → Stable |

    | PEEK Resin (Imported Ind. Grade) | ¥800–1,000 /kg | Flat | → Stalemate |

    | Carbon Fiber (T300/24K) | ¥75–85 /kg | +1.2% | ↗ Bottom Bounce |

    | Carbon Fiber (T700/12K) | ¥120–150 /kg | +0.8% | ↗ Stabilizing |

    | PI Film (Electronic Grade) | ¥1,000,000–3,000,000 /ton | Flat | → Firm |

    | Alumina (≥98.5%) | ¥2,800–3,200 /ton | +0.5% | ↗ Slight Rise |

    | Silicon Carbide (88%) | ¥5,500–6,500 /ton | Flat | → Range-bound |


    2. Key Price Movements

    2.1 PTFE Resin — Extended Weakness, Approaching Cycle Floor

    Price: Suspension medium-grade at ¥31,800/ton (Shandong), near the 30-day low of ¥30,000/ton

    WoW: -2.1%, extending the downtrend

    Key Drivers:

    Supply: A new Shandong production line came online mid-July; industry operating rate is low but inventory remains elevated, sustaining oversupply pressure

    Demand: Downstream chemicals and food packaging sectors are in a procurement slump, dominated by small spot orders with no sign of recovery

    Cost: Fluorite and hydrofluoric acid remain elevated (~¥3,781/ton for fluorite), providing cost support but insufficient to lift prices

    Outlook: Already near cash cost floor for some producers — further downside is limited. Near-term: weak consolidation

    2.2 Carbon Fiber — Early Bottom-Reversal Signal

    Price: T300/24K East China ¥75/kg; T700/12K ¥120–150/kg

    WoW: +1.2%, first positive weekly reading in 6 months

    Key Drivers:

    Policy Tailwind: Low-altitude economy (eVTOL/UAVs) formally included in China’s “15th Five-Year Plan,” significantly boosting demand expectations for structural lightweight materials

    Supply Discipline: After 12+ months of losses, smaller producers are cutting output, leading to marginal supply contraction

    Export Strength: H1 2026 carbon fiber exports posted notable YoY growth, with overseas demand outpacing expectations

    Outlook: Bottom established, but oversupply not yet fundamentally resolved — upside capped by high inventory. T700+ fine-denier grades to lead the recovery

    2.3 PI Film — High Ground Holds, Bullish Structure Intact

    Price: Electronic-grade PI film ¥1–3 million/ton (significant variation by thickness and spec)

    WoW: Flat

    Key Drivers:

    Structural Supply Deficit: High-end PI film remains heavily import-dependent (DuPont, UBE, Kaneka, SK Kolon); domestic substitution still in early stages with limited supply elasticity

    Demand Acceleration: Semiconductor packaging, flexible displays, and 5G high-frequency communications continue to scale, with demand growing at 15%+ annually

    Tech Barrier: Global production capacity concentrated among a handful of players — no large-scale new effective capacity coming online short-term

    Outlook: Dominant supply-demand structure intact. High-end grades remain on an upward trajectory; lead times extended

    2.4 PEEK Resin — Domestic Expansion Pressuring Imported Prices

    Price: Domestic ind. grade ¥400–500/kg; imported Victrex-grade ¥800–1,000/kg

    WoW: Flat; imported prices showing marginal softening

    Key Drivers:

    Capacity Buildout: Zhongyan Materials and Junhua Special Plastics continue expanding domestic capacity, narrowing the price gap with imports

    Demand Segmentation: Standard industrial grade supply-demand loosening; medical/aerospace grades hold firm due to certification barriers

    Outlook: Standard industrial PEEK entering a downward cycle. Lock in aerospace/medical-grade suppliers via annual contracts

    2.5 Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials — Mild Cost-Push Uplift

    Price: Alumina ≥98.5% at ¥2,800–3,200/ton; SiC 88% at ¥5,500–6,500/ton

    WoW: Alumina +0.5%; others flat

    Key Drivers:

    – Alumina rise driven by bauxite cost pressure; SiC capped by stable silicon feedstock prices

    – Downstream advanced ceramics demand grows steadily, but raw material sector shows only modest upward movement

    Outlook: Cost-push driven modest uptick. Expect steady-to-slightly-higher prices in August


    3. Impact Analysis

    3.1 Procurement Cost Impact

    | Material | Current Impact | Near-Term Outlook |

    |———-|—————|——————-|

    | PTFE Resin | Low-cost procurement window open; short-term costs manageable | Limited further downside — consider opportunistic restocking |

    | PEEK (Industrial Grade) | Domestic grades expanding cost advantage | Prioritize domestic sources for industrial applications; save 20–30% |

    | Carbon Fiber | Historically low cost environment for T300 | Bottom signal emerging — lock in T700 on 3–6 month terms |

    | PI Film | High-cost item — advance volume commitment advised | Tight supply — place orders 3 months ahead of need |

    | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials | Mild cost increase; limited impact | Hold 2–3 week inventory; no need for large-scale stockpiling |

    3.2 Supply Chain Impact

    PTFE: Oversupply enhances buyer leverage, but low prices may unlock new substitution applications

    Carbon Fiber: Bottom-reversal expectations may trigger a round of strategic restocking; logistics throughput likely to improve

    PI Film / PEEK: High-end grades remain import-dependent — monitor FX and geopolitical logistics risks

    Specialty Ceramics: Rising domestic capacity improves supply chain autonomy over time


    4. Actionable Recommendations

    ✅ Materials to Lock In Now

    1. Carbon Fiber (T700/12K): Bottom-reversal signal confirmed; low-altitude economy demand set to accelerate. Lock in 3–6 month forward contracts to secure pricing

    2. PI Film (Electronic Grade): Supply deficit persists through Q3. Secure supplier配额 in advance, especially for semiconductor/flexible display end-markets

    3. PEEK (Aerospace / Medical Grade): Long qualification cycles and limited suppliers. Sign annual framework agreements with preferred vendors

    ⏳ Materials to Monitor

    1. PTFE Resin (Suspension / Dispersion): Still in downtrend cycle but near cost floor. Wait 2–4 weeks for confirmed stabilization before bulk purchasing

    2. Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials: Modest fluctuations — maintain 2–3 week stock. No need for large inventory buildup


    5. Macro Signals to Watch

    Crude Oil: WTI at ~$79–84/bbl — sharp decline in late July as Mideast geopolitical risk eases; petrochemical cost support weakening

    Fluorite / Hydrofluoric Acid: Remain elevated — PTFE cost floor intact but limited upside for producers

    FX: RMB appreciation would reduce landed costs of imported materials (PI film, PEEK, specialty carbon fiber grades)


    This report is compiled from publicly available market data for reference only. Procurement decisions should factor in your organization’s inventory position, payment terms, and supplier relationships.

    Market Intelligence Officer | New Materials Price Trend Monitoring
    Date: July 30, 2026

    .Trim() -ne ” }

    if ($lines.Count -lt 2) { return $block }

    $headerLine = $lines[0]

    $bodyLines = $lines[2..($lines.Count – 1)]

    $thCells = ($headerLine -split ‘\|’ | Where-Object {

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin | PEEK Resin | Carbon Fiber | PI Film | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials


    1. Price Overview

    | Material | Current Price Range | WoW Change | Trend |

    |———-|——————-|————|——-|

    | PTFE Resin (Suspension Medium) | ¥30,000–48,000 /ton | -2.1% | ↘ Bearish |

    | PTFE Dispersion Resin | ¥60,000–65,000 /ton | -1.5% | ↘ Soft |

    | PEEK Resin (Domestic Ind. Grade) | ¥400–500 /kg | Flat | → Stable |

    | PEEK Resin (Imported Ind. Grade) | ¥800–1,000 /kg | Flat | → Stalemate |

    | Carbon Fiber (T300/24K) | ¥75–85 /kg | +1.2% | ↗ Bottom Bounce |

    | Carbon Fiber (T700/12K) | ¥120–150 /kg | +0.8% | ↗ Stabilizing |

    | PI Film (Electronic Grade) | ¥1,000,000–3,000,000 /ton | Flat | → Firm |

    | Alumina (≥98.5%) | ¥2,800–3,200 /ton | +0.5% | ↗ Slight Rise |

    | Silicon Carbide (88%) | ¥5,500–6,500 /ton | Flat | → Range-bound |


    2. Key Price Movements

    2.1 PTFE Resin — Extended Weakness, Approaching Cycle Floor

    Price: Suspension medium-grade at ¥31,800/ton (Shandong), near the 30-day low of ¥30,000/ton

    WoW: -2.1%, extending the downtrend

    Key Drivers:

    Supply: A new Shandong production line came online mid-July; industry operating rate is low but inventory remains elevated, sustaining oversupply pressure

    Demand: Downstream chemicals and food packaging sectors are in a procurement slump, dominated by small spot orders with no sign of recovery

    Cost: Fluorite and hydrofluoric acid remain elevated (~¥3,781/ton for fluorite), providing cost support but insufficient to lift prices

    Outlook: Already near cash cost floor for some producers — further downside is limited. Near-term: weak consolidation

    2.2 Carbon Fiber — Early Bottom-Reversal Signal

    Price: T300/24K East China ¥75/kg; T700/12K ¥120–150/kg

    WoW: +1.2%, first positive weekly reading in 6 months

    Key Drivers:

    Policy Tailwind: Low-altitude economy (eVTOL/UAVs) formally included in China’s “15th Five-Year Plan,” significantly boosting demand expectations for structural lightweight materials

    Supply Discipline: After 12+ months of losses, smaller producers are cutting output, leading to marginal supply contraction

    Export Strength: H1 2026 carbon fiber exports posted notable YoY growth, with overseas demand outpacing expectations

    Outlook: Bottom established, but oversupply not yet fundamentally resolved — upside capped by high inventory. T700+ fine-denier grades to lead the recovery

    2.3 PI Film — High Ground Holds, Bullish Structure Intact

    Price: Electronic-grade PI film ¥1–3 million/ton (significant variation by thickness and spec)

    WoW: Flat

    Key Drivers:

    Structural Supply Deficit: High-end PI film remains heavily import-dependent (DuPont, UBE, Kaneka, SK Kolon); domestic substitution still in early stages with limited supply elasticity

    Demand Acceleration: Semiconductor packaging, flexible displays, and 5G high-frequency communications continue to scale, with demand growing at 15%+ annually

    Tech Barrier: Global production capacity concentrated among a handful of players — no large-scale new effective capacity coming online short-term

    Outlook: Dominant supply-demand structure intact. High-end grades remain on an upward trajectory; lead times extended

    2.4 PEEK Resin — Domestic Expansion Pressuring Imported Prices

    Price: Domestic ind. grade ¥400–500/kg; imported Victrex-grade ¥800–1,000/kg

    WoW: Flat; imported prices showing marginal softening

    Key Drivers:

    Capacity Buildout: Zhongyan Materials and Junhua Special Plastics continue expanding domestic capacity, narrowing the price gap with imports

    Demand Segmentation: Standard industrial grade supply-demand loosening; medical/aerospace grades hold firm due to certification barriers

    Outlook: Standard industrial PEEK entering a downward cycle. Lock in aerospace/medical-grade suppliers via annual contracts

    2.5 Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials — Mild Cost-Push Uplift

    Price: Alumina ≥98.5% at ¥2,800–3,200/ton; SiC 88% at ¥5,500–6,500/ton

    WoW: Alumina +0.5%; others flat

    Key Drivers:

    – Alumina rise driven by bauxite cost pressure; SiC capped by stable silicon feedstock prices

    – Downstream advanced ceramics demand grows steadily, but raw material sector shows only modest upward movement

    Outlook: Cost-push driven modest uptick. Expect steady-to-slightly-higher prices in August


    3. Impact Analysis

    3.1 Procurement Cost Impact

    | Material | Current Impact | Near-Term Outlook |

    |———-|—————|——————-|

    | PTFE Resin | Low-cost procurement window open; short-term costs manageable | Limited further downside — consider opportunistic restocking |

    | PEEK (Industrial Grade) | Domestic grades expanding cost advantage | Prioritize domestic sources for industrial applications; save 20–30% |

    | Carbon Fiber | Historically low cost environment for T300 | Bottom signal emerging — lock in T700 on 3–6 month terms |

    | PI Film | High-cost item — advance volume commitment advised | Tight supply — place orders 3 months ahead of need |

    | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials | Mild cost increase; limited impact | Hold 2–3 week inventory; no need for large-scale stockpiling |

    3.2 Supply Chain Impact

    PTFE: Oversupply enhances buyer leverage, but low prices may unlock new substitution applications

    Carbon Fiber: Bottom-reversal expectations may trigger a round of strategic restocking; logistics throughput likely to improve

    PI Film / PEEK: High-end grades remain import-dependent — monitor FX and geopolitical logistics risks

    Specialty Ceramics: Rising domestic capacity improves supply chain autonomy over time


    4. Actionable Recommendations

    ✅ Materials to Lock In Now

    1. Carbon Fiber (T700/12K): Bottom-reversal signal confirmed; low-altitude economy demand set to accelerate. Lock in 3–6 month forward contracts to secure pricing

    2. PI Film (Electronic Grade): Supply deficit persists through Q3. Secure supplier配额 in advance, especially for semiconductor/flexible display end-markets

    3. PEEK (Aerospace / Medical Grade): Long qualification cycles and limited suppliers. Sign annual framework agreements with preferred vendors

    ⏳ Materials to Monitor

    1. PTFE Resin (Suspension / Dispersion): Still in downtrend cycle but near cost floor. Wait 2–4 weeks for confirmed stabilization before bulk purchasing

    2. Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials: Modest fluctuations — maintain 2–3 week stock. No need for large inventory buildup


    5. Macro Signals to Watch

    Crude Oil: WTI at ~$79–84/bbl — sharp decline in late July as Mideast geopolitical risk eases; petrochemical cost support weakening

    Fluorite / Hydrofluoric Acid: Remain elevated — PTFE cost floor intact but limited upside for producers

    FX: RMB appreciation would reduce landed costs of imported materials (PI film, PEEK, specialty carbon fiber grades)


    This report is compiled from publicly available market data for reference only. Procurement decisions should factor in your organization’s inventory position, payment terms, and supplier relationships.

    Market Intelligence Officer | New Materials Price Trend Monitoring
    Date: July 30, 2026

    .Trim() -ne ” } | ForEach-Object {

    ‘ +

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin | PEEK Resin | Carbon Fiber | PI Film | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials


    1. Price Overview

    | Material | Current Price Range | WoW Change | Trend |

    |———-|——————-|————|——-|

    | PTFE Resin (Suspension Medium) | ¥30,000–48,000 /ton | -2.1% | ↘ Bearish |

    | PTFE Dispersion Resin | ¥60,000–65,000 /ton | -1.5% | ↘ Soft |

    | PEEK Resin (Domestic Ind. Grade) | ¥400–500 /kg | Flat | → Stable |

    | PEEK Resin (Imported Ind. Grade) | ¥800–1,000 /kg | Flat | → Stalemate |

    | Carbon Fiber (T300/24K) | ¥75–85 /kg | +1.2% | ↗ Bottom Bounce |

    | Carbon Fiber (T700/12K) | ¥120–150 /kg | +0.8% | ↗ Stabilizing |

    | PI Film (Electronic Grade) | ¥1,000,000–3,000,000 /ton | Flat | → Firm |

    | Alumina (≥98.5%) | ¥2,800–3,200 /ton | +0.5% | ↗ Slight Rise |

    | Silicon Carbide (88%) | ¥5,500–6,500 /ton | Flat | → Range-bound |


    2. Key Price Movements

    2.1 PTFE Resin — Extended Weakness, Approaching Cycle Floor

    Price: Suspension medium-grade at ¥31,800/ton (Shandong), near the 30-day low of ¥30,000/ton

    WoW: -2.1%, extending the downtrend

    Key Drivers:

    Supply: A new Shandong production line came online mid-July; industry operating rate is low but inventory remains elevated, sustaining oversupply pressure

    Demand: Downstream chemicals and food packaging sectors are in a procurement slump, dominated by small spot orders with no sign of recovery

    Cost: Fluorite and hydrofluoric acid remain elevated (~¥3,781/ton for fluorite), providing cost support but insufficient to lift prices

    Outlook: Already near cash cost floor for some producers — further downside is limited. Near-term: weak consolidation

    2.2 Carbon Fiber — Early Bottom-Reversal Signal

    Price: T300/24K East China ¥75/kg; T700/12K ¥120–150/kg

    WoW: +1.2%, first positive weekly reading in 6 months

    Key Drivers:

    Policy Tailwind: Low-altitude economy (eVTOL/UAVs) formally included in China’s “15th Five-Year Plan,” significantly boosting demand expectations for structural lightweight materials

    Supply Discipline: After 12+ months of losses, smaller producers are cutting output, leading to marginal supply contraction

    Export Strength: H1 2026 carbon fiber exports posted notable YoY growth, with overseas demand outpacing expectations

    Outlook: Bottom established, but oversupply not yet fundamentally resolved — upside capped by high inventory. T700+ fine-denier grades to lead the recovery

    2.3 PI Film — High Ground Holds, Bullish Structure Intact

    Price: Electronic-grade PI film ¥1–3 million/ton (significant variation by thickness and spec)

    WoW: Flat

    Key Drivers:

    Structural Supply Deficit: High-end PI film remains heavily import-dependent (DuPont, UBE, Kaneka, SK Kolon); domestic substitution still in early stages with limited supply elasticity

    Demand Acceleration: Semiconductor packaging, flexible displays, and 5G high-frequency communications continue to scale, with demand growing at 15%+ annually

    Tech Barrier: Global production capacity concentrated among a handful of players — no large-scale new effective capacity coming online short-term

    Outlook: Dominant supply-demand structure intact. High-end grades remain on an upward trajectory; lead times extended

    2.4 PEEK Resin — Domestic Expansion Pressuring Imported Prices

    Price: Domestic ind. grade ¥400–500/kg; imported Victrex-grade ¥800–1,000/kg

    WoW: Flat; imported prices showing marginal softening

    Key Drivers:

    Capacity Buildout: Zhongyan Materials and Junhua Special Plastics continue expanding domestic capacity, narrowing the price gap with imports

    Demand Segmentation: Standard industrial grade supply-demand loosening; medical/aerospace grades hold firm due to certification barriers

    Outlook: Standard industrial PEEK entering a downward cycle. Lock in aerospace/medical-grade suppliers via annual contracts

    2.5 Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials — Mild Cost-Push Uplift

    Price: Alumina ≥98.5% at ¥2,800–3,200/ton; SiC 88% at ¥5,500–6,500/ton

    WoW: Alumina +0.5%; others flat

    Key Drivers:

    – Alumina rise driven by bauxite cost pressure; SiC capped by stable silicon feedstock prices

    – Downstream advanced ceramics demand grows steadily, but raw material sector shows only modest upward movement

    Outlook: Cost-push driven modest uptick. Expect steady-to-slightly-higher prices in August


    3. Impact Analysis

    3.1 Procurement Cost Impact

    | Material | Current Impact | Near-Term Outlook |

    |———-|—————|——————-|

    | PTFE Resin | Low-cost procurement window open; short-term costs manageable | Limited further downside — consider opportunistic restocking |

    | PEEK (Industrial Grade) | Domestic grades expanding cost advantage | Prioritize domestic sources for industrial applications; save 20–30% |

    | Carbon Fiber | Historically low cost environment for T300 | Bottom signal emerging — lock in T700 on 3–6 month terms |

    | PI Film | High-cost item — advance volume commitment advised | Tight supply — place orders 3 months ahead of need |

    | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials | Mild cost increase; limited impact | Hold 2–3 week inventory; no need for large-scale stockpiling |

    3.2 Supply Chain Impact

    PTFE: Oversupply enhances buyer leverage, but low prices may unlock new substitution applications

    Carbon Fiber: Bottom-reversal expectations may trigger a round of strategic restocking; logistics throughput likely to improve

    PI Film / PEEK: High-end grades remain import-dependent — monitor FX and geopolitical logistics risks

    Specialty Ceramics: Rising domestic capacity improves supply chain autonomy over time


    4. Actionable Recommendations

    ✅ Materials to Lock In Now

    1. Carbon Fiber (T700/12K): Bottom-reversal signal confirmed; low-altitude economy demand set to accelerate. Lock in 3–6 month forward contracts to secure pricing

    2. PI Film (Electronic Grade): Supply deficit persists through Q3. Secure supplier配额 in advance, especially for semiconductor/flexible display end-markets

    3. PEEK (Aerospace / Medical Grade): Long qualification cycles and limited suppliers. Sign annual framework agreements with preferred vendors

    ⏳ Materials to Monitor

    1. PTFE Resin (Suspension / Dispersion): Still in downtrend cycle but near cost floor. Wait 2–4 weeks for confirmed stabilization before bulk purchasing

    2. Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials: Modest fluctuations — maintain 2–3 week stock. No need for large inventory buildup


    5. Macro Signals to Watch

    Crude Oil: WTI at ~$79–84/bbl — sharp decline in late July as Mideast geopolitical risk eases; petrochemical cost support weakening

    Fluorite / Hydrofluoric Acid: Remain elevated — PTFE cost floor intact but limited upside for producers

    FX: RMB appreciation would reduce landed costs of imported materials (PI film, PEEK, specialty carbon fiber grades)


    This report is compiled from publicly available market data for reference only. Procurement decisions should factor in your organization’s inventory position, payment terms, and supplier relationships.

    Market Intelligence Officer | New Materials Price Trend Monitoring
    Date: July 30, 2026

    .Trim() + ‘

    }) -join ”

    $trCells = ($bodyLines | ForEach-Object {

    $cells = (

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin | PEEK Resin | Carbon Fiber | PI Film | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials


    1. Price Overview

    | Material | Current Price Range | WoW Change | Trend |

    |———-|——————-|————|——-|

    | PTFE Resin (Suspension Medium) | ¥30,000–48,000 /ton | -2.1% | ↘ Bearish |

    | PTFE Dispersion Resin | ¥60,000–65,000 /ton | -1.5% | ↘ Soft |

    | PEEK Resin (Domestic Ind. Grade) | ¥400–500 /kg | Flat | → Stable |

    | PEEK Resin (Imported Ind. Grade) | ¥800–1,000 /kg | Flat | → Stalemate |

    | Carbon Fiber (T300/24K) | ¥75–85 /kg | +1.2% | ↗ Bottom Bounce |

    | Carbon Fiber (T700/12K) | ¥120–150 /kg | +0.8% | ↗ Stabilizing |

    | PI Film (Electronic Grade) | ¥1,000,000–3,000,000 /ton | Flat | → Firm |

    | Alumina (≥98.5%) | ¥2,800–3,200 /ton | +0.5% | ↗ Slight Rise |

    | Silicon Carbide (88%) | ¥5,500–6,500 /ton | Flat | → Range-bound |


    2. Key Price Movements

    2.1 PTFE Resin — Extended Weakness, Approaching Cycle Floor

    Price: Suspension medium-grade at ¥31,800/ton (Shandong), near the 30-day low of ¥30,000/ton

    WoW: -2.1%, extending the downtrend

    Key Drivers:

    Supply: A new Shandong production line came online mid-July; industry operating rate is low but inventory remains elevated, sustaining oversupply pressure

    Demand: Downstream chemicals and food packaging sectors are in a procurement slump, dominated by small spot orders with no sign of recovery

    Cost: Fluorite and hydrofluoric acid remain elevated (~¥3,781/ton for fluorite), providing cost support but insufficient to lift prices

    Outlook: Already near cash cost floor for some producers — further downside is limited. Near-term: weak consolidation

    2.2 Carbon Fiber — Early Bottom-Reversal Signal

    Price: T300/24K East China ¥75/kg; T700/12K ¥120–150/kg

    WoW: +1.2%, first positive weekly reading in 6 months

    Key Drivers:

    Policy Tailwind: Low-altitude economy (eVTOL/UAVs) formally included in China’s “15th Five-Year Plan,” significantly boosting demand expectations for structural lightweight materials

    Supply Discipline: After 12+ months of losses, smaller producers are cutting output, leading to marginal supply contraction

    Export Strength: H1 2026 carbon fiber exports posted notable YoY growth, with overseas demand outpacing expectations

    Outlook: Bottom established, but oversupply not yet fundamentally resolved — upside capped by high inventory. T700+ fine-denier grades to lead the recovery

    2.3 PI Film — High Ground Holds, Bullish Structure Intact

    Price: Electronic-grade PI film ¥1–3 million/ton (significant variation by thickness and spec)

    WoW: Flat

    Key Drivers:

    Structural Supply Deficit: High-end PI film remains heavily import-dependent (DuPont, UBE, Kaneka, SK Kolon); domestic substitution still in early stages with limited supply elasticity

    Demand Acceleration: Semiconductor packaging, flexible displays, and 5G high-frequency communications continue to scale, with demand growing at 15%+ annually

    Tech Barrier: Global production capacity concentrated among a handful of players — no large-scale new effective capacity coming online short-term

    Outlook: Dominant supply-demand structure intact. High-end grades remain on an upward trajectory; lead times extended

    2.4 PEEK Resin — Domestic Expansion Pressuring Imported Prices

    Price: Domestic ind. grade ¥400–500/kg; imported Victrex-grade ¥800–1,000/kg

    WoW: Flat; imported prices showing marginal softening

    Key Drivers:

    Capacity Buildout: Zhongyan Materials and Junhua Special Plastics continue expanding domestic capacity, narrowing the price gap with imports

    Demand Segmentation: Standard industrial grade supply-demand loosening; medical/aerospace grades hold firm due to certification barriers

    Outlook: Standard industrial PEEK entering a downward cycle. Lock in aerospace/medical-grade suppliers via annual contracts

    2.5 Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials — Mild Cost-Push Uplift

    Price: Alumina ≥98.5% at ¥2,800–3,200/ton; SiC 88% at ¥5,500–6,500/ton

    WoW: Alumina +0.5%; others flat

    Key Drivers:

    – Alumina rise driven by bauxite cost pressure; SiC capped by stable silicon feedstock prices

    – Downstream advanced ceramics demand grows steadily, but raw material sector shows only modest upward movement

    Outlook: Cost-push driven modest uptick. Expect steady-to-slightly-higher prices in August


    3. Impact Analysis

    3.1 Procurement Cost Impact

    | Material | Current Impact | Near-Term Outlook |

    |———-|—————|——————-|

    | PTFE Resin | Low-cost procurement window open; short-term costs manageable | Limited further downside — consider opportunistic restocking |

    | PEEK (Industrial Grade) | Domestic grades expanding cost advantage | Prioritize domestic sources for industrial applications; save 20–30% |

    | Carbon Fiber | Historically low cost environment for T300 | Bottom signal emerging — lock in T700 on 3–6 month terms |

    | PI Film | High-cost item — advance volume commitment advised | Tight supply — place orders 3 months ahead of need |

    | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials | Mild cost increase; limited impact | Hold 2–3 week inventory; no need for large-scale stockpiling |

    3.2 Supply Chain Impact

    PTFE: Oversupply enhances buyer leverage, but low prices may unlock new substitution applications

    Carbon Fiber: Bottom-reversal expectations may trigger a round of strategic restocking; logistics throughput likely to improve

    PI Film / PEEK: High-end grades remain import-dependent — monitor FX and geopolitical logistics risks

    Specialty Ceramics: Rising domestic capacity improves supply chain autonomy over time


    4. Actionable Recommendations

    ✅ Materials to Lock In Now

    1. Carbon Fiber (T700/12K): Bottom-reversal signal confirmed; low-altitude economy demand set to accelerate. Lock in 3–6 month forward contracts to secure pricing

    2. PI Film (Electronic Grade): Supply deficit persists through Q3. Secure supplier配额 in advance, especially for semiconductor/flexible display end-markets

    3. PEEK (Aerospace / Medical Grade): Long qualification cycles and limited suppliers. Sign annual framework agreements with preferred vendors

    ⏳ Materials to Monitor

    1. PTFE Resin (Suspension / Dispersion): Still in downtrend cycle but near cost floor. Wait 2–4 weeks for confirmed stabilization before bulk purchasing

    2. Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials: Modest fluctuations — maintain 2–3 week stock. No need for large inventory buildup


    5. Macro Signals to Watch

    Crude Oil: WTI at ~$79–84/bbl — sharp decline in late July as Mideast geopolitical risk eases; petrochemical cost support weakening

    Fluorite / Hydrofluoric Acid: Remain elevated — PTFE cost floor intact but limited upside for producers

    FX: RMB appreciation would reduce landed costs of imported materials (PI film, PEEK, specialty carbon fiber grades)


    This report is compiled from publicly available market data for reference only. Procurement decisions should factor in your organization’s inventory position, payment terms, and supplier relationships.

    Market Intelligence Officer | New Materials Price Trend Monitoring
    Date: July 30, 2026

    -split ‘\|’ | Where-Object {

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin | PEEK Resin | Carbon Fiber | PI Film | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials


    1. Price Overview

    | Material | Current Price Range | WoW Change | Trend |

    |———-|——————-|————|——-|

    | PTFE Resin (Suspension Medium) | ¥30,000–48,000 /ton | -2.1% | ↘ Bearish |

    | PTFE Dispersion Resin | ¥60,000–65,000 /ton | -1.5% | ↘ Soft |

    | PEEK Resin (Domestic Ind. Grade) | ¥400–500 /kg | Flat | → Stable |

    | PEEK Resin (Imported Ind. Grade) | ¥800–1,000 /kg | Flat | → Stalemate |

    | Carbon Fiber (T300/24K) | ¥75–85 /kg | +1.2% | ↗ Bottom Bounce |

    | Carbon Fiber (T700/12K) | ¥120–150 /kg | +0.8% | ↗ Stabilizing |

    | PI Film (Electronic Grade) | ¥1,000,000–3,000,000 /ton | Flat | → Firm |

    | Alumina (≥98.5%) | ¥2,800–3,200 /ton | +0.5% | ↗ Slight Rise |

    | Silicon Carbide (88%) | ¥5,500–6,500 /ton | Flat | → Range-bound |


    2. Key Price Movements

    2.1 PTFE Resin — Extended Weakness, Approaching Cycle Floor

    Price: Suspension medium-grade at ¥31,800/ton (Shandong), near the 30-day low of ¥30,000/ton

    WoW: -2.1%, extending the downtrend

    Key Drivers:

    Supply: A new Shandong production line came online mid-July; industry operating rate is low but inventory remains elevated, sustaining oversupply pressure

    Demand: Downstream chemicals and food packaging sectors are in a procurement slump, dominated by small spot orders with no sign of recovery

    Cost: Fluorite and hydrofluoric acid remain elevated (~¥3,781/ton for fluorite), providing cost support but insufficient to lift prices

    Outlook: Already near cash cost floor for some producers — further downside is limited. Near-term: weak consolidation

    2.2 Carbon Fiber — Early Bottom-Reversal Signal

    Price: T300/24K East China ¥75/kg; T700/12K ¥120–150/kg

    WoW: +1.2%, first positive weekly reading in 6 months

    Key Drivers:

    Policy Tailwind: Low-altitude economy (eVTOL/UAVs) formally included in China’s “15th Five-Year Plan,” significantly boosting demand expectations for structural lightweight materials

    Supply Discipline: After 12+ months of losses, smaller producers are cutting output, leading to marginal supply contraction

    Export Strength: H1 2026 carbon fiber exports posted notable YoY growth, with overseas demand outpacing expectations

    Outlook: Bottom established, but oversupply not yet fundamentally resolved — upside capped by high inventory. T700+ fine-denier grades to lead the recovery

    2.3 PI Film — High Ground Holds, Bullish Structure Intact

    Price: Electronic-grade PI film ¥1–3 million/ton (significant variation by thickness and spec)

    WoW: Flat

    Key Drivers:

    Structural Supply Deficit: High-end PI film remains heavily import-dependent (DuPont, UBE, Kaneka, SK Kolon); domestic substitution still in early stages with limited supply elasticity

    Demand Acceleration: Semiconductor packaging, flexible displays, and 5G high-frequency communications continue to scale, with demand growing at 15%+ annually

    Tech Barrier: Global production capacity concentrated among a handful of players — no large-scale new effective capacity coming online short-term

    Outlook: Dominant supply-demand structure intact. High-end grades remain on an upward trajectory; lead times extended

    2.4 PEEK Resin — Domestic Expansion Pressuring Imported Prices

    Price: Domestic ind. grade ¥400–500/kg; imported Victrex-grade ¥800–1,000/kg

    WoW: Flat; imported prices showing marginal softening

    Key Drivers:

    Capacity Buildout: Zhongyan Materials and Junhua Special Plastics continue expanding domestic capacity, narrowing the price gap with imports

    Demand Segmentation: Standard industrial grade supply-demand loosening; medical/aerospace grades hold firm due to certification barriers

    Outlook: Standard industrial PEEK entering a downward cycle. Lock in aerospace/medical-grade suppliers via annual contracts

    2.5 Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials — Mild Cost-Push Uplift

    Price: Alumina ≥98.5% at ¥2,800–3,200/ton; SiC 88% at ¥5,500–6,500/ton

    WoW: Alumina +0.5%; others flat

    Key Drivers:

    – Alumina rise driven by bauxite cost pressure; SiC capped by stable silicon feedstock prices

    – Downstream advanced ceramics demand grows steadily, but raw material sector shows only modest upward movement

    Outlook: Cost-push driven modest uptick. Expect steady-to-slightly-higher prices in August


    3. Impact Analysis

    3.1 Procurement Cost Impact

    | Material | Current Impact | Near-Term Outlook |

    |———-|—————|——————-|

    | PTFE Resin | Low-cost procurement window open; short-term costs manageable | Limited further downside — consider opportunistic restocking |

    | PEEK (Industrial Grade) | Domestic grades expanding cost advantage | Prioritize domestic sources for industrial applications; save 20–30% |

    | Carbon Fiber | Historically low cost environment for T300 | Bottom signal emerging — lock in T700 on 3–6 month terms |

    | PI Film | High-cost item — advance volume commitment advised | Tight supply — place orders 3 months ahead of need |

    | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials | Mild cost increase; limited impact | Hold 2–3 week inventory; no need for large-scale stockpiling |

    3.2 Supply Chain Impact

    PTFE: Oversupply enhances buyer leverage, but low prices may unlock new substitution applications

    Carbon Fiber: Bottom-reversal expectations may trigger a round of strategic restocking; logistics throughput likely to improve

    PI Film / PEEK: High-end grades remain import-dependent — monitor FX and geopolitical logistics risks

    Specialty Ceramics: Rising domestic capacity improves supply chain autonomy over time


    4. Actionable Recommendations

    ✅ Materials to Lock In Now

    1. Carbon Fiber (T700/12K): Bottom-reversal signal confirmed; low-altitude economy demand set to accelerate. Lock in 3–6 month forward contracts to secure pricing

    2. PI Film (Electronic Grade): Supply deficit persists through Q3. Secure supplier配额 in advance, especially for semiconductor/flexible display end-markets

    3. PEEK (Aerospace / Medical Grade): Long qualification cycles and limited suppliers. Sign annual framework agreements with preferred vendors

    ⏳ Materials to Monitor

    1. PTFE Resin (Suspension / Dispersion): Still in downtrend cycle but near cost floor. Wait 2–4 weeks for confirmed stabilization before bulk purchasing

    2. Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials: Modest fluctuations — maintain 2–3 week stock. No need for large inventory buildup


    5. Macro Signals to Watch

    Crude Oil: WTI at ~$79–84/bbl — sharp decline in late July as Mideast geopolitical risk eases; petrochemical cost support weakening

    Fluorite / Hydrofluoric Acid: Remain elevated — PTFE cost floor intact but limited upside for producers

    FX: RMB appreciation would reduce landed costs of imported materials (PI film, PEEK, specialty carbon fiber grades)


    This report is compiled from publicly available market data for reference only. Procurement decisions should factor in your organization’s inventory position, payment terms, and supplier relationships.

    Market Intelligence Officer | New Materials Price Trend Monitoring
    Date: July 30, 2026

    .Trim() -ne ” } | ForEach-Object {

    ‘ +

    New Materials Price Trend Daily Report — July 30, 2026

    Published: July 30, 2026
    Coverage: PTFE Resin | PEEK Resin | Carbon Fiber | PI Film | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials


    1. Price Overview

    | Material | Current Price Range | WoW Change | Trend |

    |———-|——————-|————|——-|

    | PTFE Resin (Suspension Medium) | ¥30,000–48,000 /ton | -2.1% | ↘ Bearish |

    | PTFE Dispersion Resin | ¥60,000–65,000 /ton | -1.5% | ↘ Soft |

    | PEEK Resin (Domestic Ind. Grade) | ¥400–500 /kg | Flat | → Stable |

    | PEEK Resin (Imported Ind. Grade) | ¥800–1,000 /kg | Flat | → Stalemate |

    | Carbon Fiber (T300/24K) | ¥75–85 /kg | +1.2% | ↗ Bottom Bounce |

    | Carbon Fiber (T700/12K) | ¥120–150 /kg | +0.8% | ↗ Stabilizing |

    | PI Film (Electronic Grade) | ¥1,000,000–3,000,000 /ton | Flat | → Firm |

    | Alumina (≥98.5%) | ¥2,800–3,200 /ton | +0.5% | ↗ Slight Rise |

    | Silicon Carbide (88%) | ¥5,500–6,500 /ton | Flat | → Range-bound |


    2. Key Price Movements

    2.1 PTFE Resin — Extended Weakness, Approaching Cycle Floor

    Price: Suspension medium-grade at ¥31,800/ton (Shandong), near the 30-day low of ¥30,000/ton

    WoW: -2.1%, extending the downtrend

    Key Drivers:

    Supply: A new Shandong production line came online mid-July; industry operating rate is low but inventory remains elevated, sustaining oversupply pressure

    Demand: Downstream chemicals and food packaging sectors are in a procurement slump, dominated by small spot orders with no sign of recovery

    Cost: Fluorite and hydrofluoric acid remain elevated (~¥3,781/ton for fluorite), providing cost support but insufficient to lift prices

    Outlook: Already near cash cost floor for some producers — further downside is limited. Near-term: weak consolidation

    2.2 Carbon Fiber — Early Bottom-Reversal Signal

    Price: T300/24K East China ¥75/kg; T700/12K ¥120–150/kg

    WoW: +1.2%, first positive weekly reading in 6 months

    Key Drivers:

    Policy Tailwind: Low-altitude economy (eVTOL/UAVs) formally included in China’s “15th Five-Year Plan,” significantly boosting demand expectations for structural lightweight materials

    Supply Discipline: After 12+ months of losses, smaller producers are cutting output, leading to marginal supply contraction

    Export Strength: H1 2026 carbon fiber exports posted notable YoY growth, with overseas demand outpacing expectations

    Outlook: Bottom established, but oversupply not yet fundamentally resolved — upside capped by high inventory. T700+ fine-denier grades to lead the recovery

    2.3 PI Film — High Ground Holds, Bullish Structure Intact

    Price: Electronic-grade PI film ¥1–3 million/ton (significant variation by thickness and spec)

    WoW: Flat

    Key Drivers:

    Structural Supply Deficit: High-end PI film remains heavily import-dependent (DuPont, UBE, Kaneka, SK Kolon); domestic substitution still in early stages with limited supply elasticity

    Demand Acceleration: Semiconductor packaging, flexible displays, and 5G high-frequency communications continue to scale, with demand growing at 15%+ annually

    Tech Barrier: Global production capacity concentrated among a handful of players — no large-scale new effective capacity coming online short-term

    Outlook: Dominant supply-demand structure intact. High-end grades remain on an upward trajectory; lead times extended

    2.4 PEEK Resin — Domestic Expansion Pressuring Imported Prices

    Price: Domestic ind. grade ¥400–500/kg; imported Victrex-grade ¥800–1,000/kg

    WoW: Flat; imported prices showing marginal softening

    Key Drivers:

    Capacity Buildout: Zhongyan Materials and Junhua Special Plastics continue expanding domestic capacity, narrowing the price gap with imports

    Demand Segmentation: Standard industrial grade supply-demand loosening; medical/aerospace grades hold firm due to certification barriers

    Outlook: Standard industrial PEEK entering a downward cycle. Lock in aerospace/medical-grade suppliers via annual contracts

    2.5 Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials — Mild Cost-Push Uplift

    Price: Alumina ≥98.5% at ¥2,800–3,200/ton; SiC 88% at ¥5,500–6,500/ton

    WoW: Alumina +0.5%; others flat

    Key Drivers:

    – Alumina rise driven by bauxite cost pressure; SiC capped by stable silicon feedstock prices

    – Downstream advanced ceramics demand grows steadily, but raw material sector shows only modest upward movement

    Outlook: Cost-push driven modest uptick. Expect steady-to-slightly-higher prices in August


    3. Impact Analysis

    3.1 Procurement Cost Impact

    | Material | Current Impact | Near-Term Outlook |

    |———-|—————|——————-|

    | PTFE Resin | Low-cost procurement window open; short-term costs manageable | Limited further downside — consider opportunistic restocking |

    | PEEK (Industrial Grade) | Domestic grades expanding cost advantage | Prioritize domestic sources for industrial applications; save 20–30% |

    | Carbon Fiber | Historically low cost environment for T300 | Bottom signal emerging — lock in T700 on 3–6 month terms |

    | PI Film | High-cost item — advance volume commitment advised | Tight supply — place orders 3 months ahead of need |

    | Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials | Mild cost increase; limited impact | Hold 2–3 week inventory; no need for large-scale stockpiling |

    3.2 Supply Chain Impact

    PTFE: Oversupply enhances buyer leverage, but low prices may unlock new substitution applications

    Carbon Fiber: Bottom-reversal expectations may trigger a round of strategic restocking; logistics throughput likely to improve

    PI Film / PEEK: High-end grades remain import-dependent — monitor FX and geopolitical logistics risks

    Specialty Ceramics: Rising domestic capacity improves supply chain autonomy over time


    4. Actionable Recommendations

    ✅ Materials to Lock In Now

    1. Carbon Fiber (T700/12K): Bottom-reversal signal confirmed; low-altitude economy demand set to accelerate. Lock in 3–6 month forward contracts to secure pricing

    2. PI Film (Electronic Grade): Supply deficit persists through Q3. Secure supplier配额 in advance, especially for semiconductor/flexible display end-markets

    3. PEEK (Aerospace / Medical Grade): Long qualification cycles and limited suppliers. Sign annual framework agreements with preferred vendors

    ⏳ Materials to Monitor

    1. PTFE Resin (Suspension / Dispersion): Still in downtrend cycle but near cost floor. Wait 2–4 weeks for confirmed stabilization before bulk purchasing

    2. Specialty Ceramic Raw Materials: Modest fluctuations — maintain 2–3 week stock. No need for large inventory buildup


    5. Macro Signals to Watch

    Crude Oil: WTI at ~$79–84/bbl — sharp decline in late July as Mideast geopolitical risk eases; petrochemical cost support weakening

    Fluorite / Hydrofluoric Acid: Remain elevated — PTFE cost floor intact but limited upside for producers

    FX: RMB appreciation would reduce landed costs of imported materials (PI film, PEEK, specialty carbon fiber grades)


    This report is compiled from publicly available market data for reference only. Procurement decisions should factor in your organization’s inventory position, payment terms, and supplier relationships.

    Market Intelligence Officer | New Materials Price Trend Monitoring
    Date: July 30, 2026

    .Trim() + ‘

    }) -join ”

    ‘ + $cells + ‘

    }) -join ”

    ‘ + $thCells + ‘‘ + $trCells + ‘

    New Materials Price Trend Monitoring

    Date: July 30, 2026

  • 2026-07-30 新材方値价校R动势日报

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂

    $block =

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂 | PEEK树脂 | 碳纤维 | PI薄膜 | 特种陶瓷原料


    一、价格概览表

    | 材料 | 当前价格区间 | 周环比 | 趋势方向 |

    |——|————-|——–|———-|

    | PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒) | 30,000–48,000 元/吨 | -2.1% | ↘ 弱势下行 |

    | PTFE分散树脂 | 60,000–65,000 元/吨 | -1.5% | ↘ 偏弱整理 |

    | PEEK树脂(国产工业级) | 400–500 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 区间稳定 |

    | PEEK树脂(进口工业级) | 800–1,000 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 僵持整理 |

    | 碳纤维(T300/24K) | 75–85 元/千克 | +1.2% | ↗ 底部微涨 |

    | 碳纤维(T700/12K) | 120–150 元/千克 | +0.8% | ↗ 触底企稳 |

    | PI薄膜(电子级) | 100–300 万元/吨 | 持平 | → 高位持稳 |

    | 氧化铝(≥98.5%) | 2,800–3,200 元/吨 | +0.5% | ↗ 小幅上探 |

    | 碳化硅(88%) | 5,500–6,500 元/吨 | 持平 | → 整理观望 |


    二、重点变动分析

    2.1 PTFE树脂 — 持续承压,接近周期底部

    价格区间: 悬浮中粒主流31,800元/吨(山东),处于近30天低点(30,000元/吨)附近

    周环比: -2.1%,延续弱势

    核心驱动:

    供给端: 山东某新产能项目7月中旬投产,行业整体开工率偏低但库存偏高,供应压力不减

    需求端: 下游化工/食品包装行业采购情绪低迷,按需小单为主,无明显增量

    成本端: 萤石、氢氟酸价格高位(萤石约3,781元/吨),成本托底效应存在,但支撑有限

    判断: 价格已接近部分企业现金流成本线,进一步下行空间有限,短期偏弱整理

    2.2 碳纤维 — 底部反转信号初现

    价格区间: T300/24K华东75元/千克,T700/12K约120–150元/千克

    周环比: +1.2%,近半年来首次转正

    核心驱动:

    政策催化: 低空经济(eVTOL/无人机)纳入”十五五”规划,碳纤维作为结构轻量化核心材料,需求预期升温

    供给出清: 行业连续亏损1年后,中小产能开始停产降负,供应边际收缩

    出口回暖: 2026年上半年碳纤维出口量同比增幅明显,海外需求好于预期

    判断: 底部确立,但供大于求格局未根本扭转,反弹空间受制于库存高度;T700以上小丝束优先受益

    2.3 PI薄膜 — 高位持稳,景气延续

    价格区间: 电子级PI薄膜100–300万元/吨(厚度/规格差异显著)

    周环比: 持平

    核心驱动:

    供需格局: 国内高端PI薄膜严重依赖进口(杜邦/宇部/钟渊/韩SK),国产替代仍处早期阶段,供给弹性不足

    需求支撑: 半导体封装、柔性显示、5G高频通信等高端应用持续放量,需求增速保持15%以上

    技术壁垒: 全球仅少数企业具备量产能力,短期无新增大规模有效产能

    判断: 强势格局延续,国产化提速但短期难改进口依赖,高端型号价格仍有上行动力

    2.4 PEEK树脂 — 国产替代压制进口价格

    价格区间: 国产工业级400–500元/公斤,进口威格斯等800–1,000元/公斤

    周环比: 持平,进口端略有松动

    核心驱动:

    国产扩产: 中研股份、君华特塑等国内厂商持续扩产,国产与进口价差收窄

    需求分化: 工业级供需趋松;医疗/航空航天级因认证门槛高,价格坚挺

    判断: 普通工业级价格进入下行通道;建议锁定航空航天/医疗级PEEK的稳定供应商

    2.5 特种陶瓷原料 — 成本推动型小幅上涨

    价格区间: 氧化铝≥98.5%约2,800–3,200元/吨;碳化硅88%约5,500–6,500元/吨

    周环比: 氧化铝+0.5%,其余持平

    核心驱动:

    – 氧化铝上涨主因铝土矿成本上移;碳化硅受硅质原料价格平稳压制

    – 下游特种陶瓷/精密陶瓷需求稳增,但原料端整体涨幅温和

    判断: 成本推动型小幅上涨,预计8月维持稳中有升态势


    三、影响分析

    3.1 对采购成本的影响

    | 材料 | 当前采购影响 | 短期展望 |

    |——|————-|———|

    | PTFE树脂 | 低位采购窗口期,短期成本可控 | 继续下行空间有限,建议逢低适量补库 |

    | PEEK树脂(工业级) | 国产货源性价比优势扩大 | 工业级可优先采购国产,节省成本20–30% |

    | 碳纤维 | 历史低位,T300级采购成本友好 | 底部信号出现,可适当锁定T700长单 |

    | PI薄膜 | 高成本项目,建议提前锁量 | 供应偏紧,建议提前3个月备货 |

    | 特种陶瓷原料 | 成本温和上行,影响有限 | 适量储备氧化铝,关注稀土原料波动 |

    3.2 对供应链的影响

    PTFE: 供应过剩,买方议价能力增强,但低价可能刺激新增替代应用

    碳纤维: 底部反转预期下,供应链存在阶段性补库需求,物流周转可能加速

    PI薄膜/PEEK: 高端牌号供应仍以进口为主,需关注汇率波动和地缘物流风险

    特种陶瓷: 国产化率提升中,供应链自主可控性逐步改善


    四、行动建议

    ✅ 建议锁定价格的材料

    1. 碳纤维(T700/12K): 底部反转信号已现,下游低空经济需求预期升温,建议锁定3–6个月长单,锁定成本

    2. PI薄膜(电子级): 供应偏紧格局短期难改,建议提前锁定供应商配额,尤其面向半导体/柔性显示客户

    3. PEEK树脂(航空航天/医疗级): 认证周期长、供应商稀缺,建议签订年度框架协议

    ⏳ 建议观望的材料

    1. PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒/分散树脂): 价格处于下行周期底部,但供过于求格局未变,观望2–4周确认止跌信号后再批量补库

    2. 特种陶瓷原料: 小幅波动,库存周期保持2–3周即可,无需大规模囤货


    五、宏观信号监测

    原油价格: WTI约79–84美元/桶(7月底大幅下跌,中东地缘风险降温),化工品成本支撑边际减弱

    萤石/氢氟酸: 高位运行,PTFE成本支撑仍在,但力度有限

    汇率: 人民币汇率若走强,进口高端材料(PI/PEEK/碳纤维)采购成本将有所改善


    本报告基于公开市场数据整理,仅供参考。实际采购决策请结合企业自身库存、账期及供应商关系综合判断。

    市场情报官 | 新材料价格趋势监控
    日期: 2026-07-30

    .Value

    $lines = $block -split ‘\r?\n’ | Where-Object {

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂 | PEEK树脂 | 碳纤维 | PI薄膜 | 特种陶瓷原料


    一、价格概览表

    | 材料 | 当前价格区间 | 周环比 | 趋势方向 |

    |——|————-|——–|———-|

    | PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒) | 30,000–48,000 元/吨 | -2.1% | ↘ 弱势下行 |

    | PTFE分散树脂 | 60,000–65,000 元/吨 | -1.5% | ↘ 偏弱整理 |

    | PEEK树脂(国产工业级) | 400–500 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 区间稳定 |

    | PEEK树脂(进口工业级) | 800–1,000 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 僵持整理 |

    | 碳纤维(T300/24K) | 75–85 元/千克 | +1.2% | ↗ 底部微涨 |

    | 碳纤维(T700/12K) | 120–150 元/千克 | +0.8% | ↗ 触底企稳 |

    | PI薄膜(电子级) | 100–300 万元/吨 | 持平 | → 高位持稳 |

    | 氧化铝(≥98.5%) | 2,800–3,200 元/吨 | +0.5% | ↗ 小幅上探 |

    | 碳化硅(88%) | 5,500–6,500 元/吨 | 持平 | → 整理观望 |


    二、重点变动分析

    2.1 PTFE树脂 — 持续承压,接近周期底部

    价格区间: 悬浮中粒主流31,800元/吨(山东),处于近30天低点(30,000元/吨)附近

    周环比: -2.1%,延续弱势

    核心驱动:

    供给端: 山东某新产能项目7月中旬投产,行业整体开工率偏低但库存偏高,供应压力不减

    需求端: 下游化工/食品包装行业采购情绪低迷,按需小单为主,无明显增量

    成本端: 萤石、氢氟酸价格高位(萤石约3,781元/吨),成本托底效应存在,但支撑有限

    判断: 价格已接近部分企业现金流成本线,进一步下行空间有限,短期偏弱整理

    2.2 碳纤维 — 底部反转信号初现

    价格区间: T300/24K华东75元/千克,T700/12K约120–150元/千克

    周环比: +1.2%,近半年来首次转正

    核心驱动:

    政策催化: 低空经济(eVTOL/无人机)纳入”十五五”规划,碳纤维作为结构轻量化核心材料,需求预期升温

    供给出清: 行业连续亏损1年后,中小产能开始停产降负,供应边际收缩

    出口回暖: 2026年上半年碳纤维出口量同比增幅明显,海外需求好于预期

    判断: 底部确立,但供大于求格局未根本扭转,反弹空间受制于库存高度;T700以上小丝束优先受益

    2.3 PI薄膜 — 高位持稳,景气延续

    价格区间: 电子级PI薄膜100–300万元/吨(厚度/规格差异显著)

    周环比: 持平

    核心驱动:

    供需格局: 国内高端PI薄膜严重依赖进口(杜邦/宇部/钟渊/韩SK),国产替代仍处早期阶段,供给弹性不足

    需求支撑: 半导体封装、柔性显示、5G高频通信等高端应用持续放量,需求增速保持15%以上

    技术壁垒: 全球仅少数企业具备量产能力,短期无新增大规模有效产能

    判断: 强势格局延续,国产化提速但短期难改进口依赖,高端型号价格仍有上行动力

    2.4 PEEK树脂 — 国产替代压制进口价格

    价格区间: 国产工业级400–500元/公斤,进口威格斯等800–1,000元/公斤

    周环比: 持平,进口端略有松动

    核心驱动:

    国产扩产: 中研股份、君华特塑等国内厂商持续扩产,国产与进口价差收窄

    需求分化: 工业级供需趋松;医疗/航空航天级因认证门槛高,价格坚挺

    判断: 普通工业级价格进入下行通道;建议锁定航空航天/医疗级PEEK的稳定供应商

    2.5 特种陶瓷原料 — 成本推动型小幅上涨

    价格区间: 氧化铝≥98.5%约2,800–3,200元/吨;碳化硅88%约5,500–6,500元/吨

    周环比: 氧化铝+0.5%,其余持平

    核心驱动:

    – 氧化铝上涨主因铝土矿成本上移;碳化硅受硅质原料价格平稳压制

    – 下游特种陶瓷/精密陶瓷需求稳增,但原料端整体涨幅温和

    判断: 成本推动型小幅上涨,预计8月维持稳中有升态势


    三、影响分析

    3.1 对采购成本的影响

    | 材料 | 当前采购影响 | 短期展望 |

    |——|————-|———|

    | PTFE树脂 | 低位采购窗口期,短期成本可控 | 继续下行空间有限,建议逢低适量补库 |

    | PEEK树脂(工业级) | 国产货源性价比优势扩大 | 工业级可优先采购国产,节省成本20–30% |

    | 碳纤维 | 历史低位,T300级采购成本友好 | 底部信号出现,可适当锁定T700长单 |

    | PI薄膜 | 高成本项目,建议提前锁量 | 供应偏紧,建议提前3个月备货 |

    | 特种陶瓷原料 | 成本温和上行,影响有限 | 适量储备氧化铝,关注稀土原料波动 |

    3.2 对供应链的影响

    PTFE: 供应过剩,买方议价能力增强,但低价可能刺激新增替代应用

    碳纤维: 底部反转预期下,供应链存在阶段性补库需求,物流周转可能加速

    PI薄膜/PEEK: 高端牌号供应仍以进口为主,需关注汇率波动和地缘物流风险

    特种陶瓷: 国产化率提升中,供应链自主可控性逐步改善


    四、行动建议

    ✅ 建议锁定价格的材料

    1. 碳纤维(T700/12K): 底部反转信号已现,下游低空经济需求预期升温,建议锁定3–6个月长单,锁定成本

    2. PI薄膜(电子级): 供应偏紧格局短期难改,建议提前锁定供应商配额,尤其面向半导体/柔性显示客户

    3. PEEK树脂(航空航天/医疗级): 认证周期长、供应商稀缺,建议签订年度框架协议

    ⏳ 建议观望的材料

    1. PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒/分散树脂): 价格处于下行周期底部,但供过于求格局未变,观望2–4周确认止跌信号后再批量补库

    2. 特种陶瓷原料: 小幅波动,库存周期保持2–3周即可,无需大规模囤货


    五、宏观信号监测

    原油价格: WTI约79–84美元/桶(7月底大幅下跌,中东地缘风险降温),化工品成本支撑边际减弱

    萤石/氢氟酸: 高位运行,PTFE成本支撑仍在,但力度有限

    汇率: 人民币汇率若走强,进口高端材料(PI/PEEK/碳纤维)采购成本将有所改善


    本报告基于公开市场数据整理,仅供参考。实际采购决策请结合企业自身库存、账期及供应商关系综合判断。

    市场情报官 | 新材料价格趋势监控
    日期: 2026-07-30

    .Trim() -ne ” }

    if ($lines.Count -lt 2) { return $block }

    $headerLine = $lines[0]

    $bodyLines = $lines[2..($lines.Count – 1)]

    $thCells = ($headerLine -split ‘\|’ | Where-Object {

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂 | PEEK树脂 | 碳纤维 | PI薄膜 | 特种陶瓷原料


    一、价格概览表

    | 材料 | 当前价格区间 | 周环比 | 趋势方向 |

    |——|————-|——–|———-|

    | PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒) | 30,000–48,000 元/吨 | -2.1% | ↘ 弱势下行 |

    | PTFE分散树脂 | 60,000–65,000 元/吨 | -1.5% | ↘ 偏弱整理 |

    | PEEK树脂(国产工业级) | 400–500 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 区间稳定 |

    | PEEK树脂(进口工业级) | 800–1,000 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 僵持整理 |

    | 碳纤维(T300/24K) | 75–85 元/千克 | +1.2% | ↗ 底部微涨 |

    | 碳纤维(T700/12K) | 120–150 元/千克 | +0.8% | ↗ 触底企稳 |

    | PI薄膜(电子级) | 100–300 万元/吨 | 持平 | → 高位持稳 |

    | 氧化铝(≥98.5%) | 2,800–3,200 元/吨 | +0.5% | ↗ 小幅上探 |

    | 碳化硅(88%) | 5,500–6,500 元/吨 | 持平 | → 整理观望 |


    二、重点变动分析

    2.1 PTFE树脂 — 持续承压,接近周期底部

    价格区间: 悬浮中粒主流31,800元/吨(山东),处于近30天低点(30,000元/吨)附近

    周环比: -2.1%,延续弱势

    核心驱动:

    供给端: 山东某新产能项目7月中旬投产,行业整体开工率偏低但库存偏高,供应压力不减

    需求端: 下游化工/食品包装行业采购情绪低迷,按需小单为主,无明显增量

    成本端: 萤石、氢氟酸价格高位(萤石约3,781元/吨),成本托底效应存在,但支撑有限

    判断: 价格已接近部分企业现金流成本线,进一步下行空间有限,短期偏弱整理

    2.2 碳纤维 — 底部反转信号初现

    价格区间: T300/24K华东75元/千克,T700/12K约120–150元/千克

    周环比: +1.2%,近半年来首次转正

    核心驱动:

    政策催化: 低空经济(eVTOL/无人机)纳入”十五五”规划,碳纤维作为结构轻量化核心材料,需求预期升温

    供给出清: 行业连续亏损1年后,中小产能开始停产降负,供应边际收缩

    出口回暖: 2026年上半年碳纤维出口量同比增幅明显,海外需求好于预期

    判断: 底部确立,但供大于求格局未根本扭转,反弹空间受制于库存高度;T700以上小丝束优先受益

    2.3 PI薄膜 — 高位持稳,景气延续

    价格区间: 电子级PI薄膜100–300万元/吨(厚度/规格差异显著)

    周环比: 持平

    核心驱动:

    供需格局: 国内高端PI薄膜严重依赖进口(杜邦/宇部/钟渊/韩SK),国产替代仍处早期阶段,供给弹性不足

    需求支撑: 半导体封装、柔性显示、5G高频通信等高端应用持续放量,需求增速保持15%以上

    技术壁垒: 全球仅少数企业具备量产能力,短期无新增大规模有效产能

    判断: 强势格局延续,国产化提速但短期难改进口依赖,高端型号价格仍有上行动力

    2.4 PEEK树脂 — 国产替代压制进口价格

    价格区间: 国产工业级400–500元/公斤,进口威格斯等800–1,000元/公斤

    周环比: 持平,进口端略有松动

    核心驱动:

    国产扩产: 中研股份、君华特塑等国内厂商持续扩产,国产与进口价差收窄

    需求分化: 工业级供需趋松;医疗/航空航天级因认证门槛高,价格坚挺

    判断: 普通工业级价格进入下行通道;建议锁定航空航天/医疗级PEEK的稳定供应商

    2.5 特种陶瓷原料 — 成本推动型小幅上涨

    价格区间: 氧化铝≥98.5%约2,800–3,200元/吨;碳化硅88%约5,500–6,500元/吨

    周环比: 氧化铝+0.5%,其余持平

    核心驱动:

    – 氧化铝上涨主因铝土矿成本上移;碳化硅受硅质原料价格平稳压制

    – 下游特种陶瓷/精密陶瓷需求稳增,但原料端整体涨幅温和

    判断: 成本推动型小幅上涨,预计8月维持稳中有升态势


    三、影响分析

    3.1 对采购成本的影响

    | 材料 | 当前采购影响 | 短期展望 |

    |——|————-|———|

    | PTFE树脂 | 低位采购窗口期,短期成本可控 | 继续下行空间有限,建议逢低适量补库 |

    | PEEK树脂(工业级) | 国产货源性价比优势扩大 | 工业级可优先采购国产,节省成本20–30% |

    | 碳纤维 | 历史低位,T300级采购成本友好 | 底部信号出现,可适当锁定T700长单 |

    | PI薄膜 | 高成本项目,建议提前锁量 | 供应偏紧,建议提前3个月备货 |

    | 特种陶瓷原料 | 成本温和上行,影响有限 | 适量储备氧化铝,关注稀土原料波动 |

    3.2 对供应链的影响

    PTFE: 供应过剩,买方议价能力增强,但低价可能刺激新增替代应用

    碳纤维: 底部反转预期下,供应链存在阶段性补库需求,物流周转可能加速

    PI薄膜/PEEK: 高端牌号供应仍以进口为主,需关注汇率波动和地缘物流风险

    特种陶瓷: 国产化率提升中,供应链自主可控性逐步改善


    四、行动建议

    ✅ 建议锁定价格的材料

    1. 碳纤维(T700/12K): 底部反转信号已现,下游低空经济需求预期升温,建议锁定3–6个月长单,锁定成本

    2. PI薄膜(电子级): 供应偏紧格局短期难改,建议提前锁定供应商配额,尤其面向半导体/柔性显示客户

    3. PEEK树脂(航空航天/医疗级): 认证周期长、供应商稀缺,建议签订年度框架协议

    ⏳ 建议观望的材料

    1. PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒/分散树脂): 价格处于下行周期底部,但供过于求格局未变,观望2–4周确认止跌信号后再批量补库

    2. 特种陶瓷原料: 小幅波动,库存周期保持2–3周即可,无需大规模囤货


    五、宏观信号监测

    原油价格: WTI约79–84美元/桶(7月底大幅下跌,中东地缘风险降温),化工品成本支撑边际减弱

    萤石/氢氟酸: 高位运行,PTFE成本支撑仍在,但力度有限

    汇率: 人民币汇率若走强,进口高端材料(PI/PEEK/碳纤维)采购成本将有所改善


    本报告基于公开市场数据整理,仅供参考。实际采购决策请结合企业自身库存、账期及供应商关系综合判断。

    市场情报官 | 新材料价格趋势监控
    日期: 2026-07-30

    .Trim() -ne ” } | ForEach-Object {

    ‘ +

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂 | PEEK树脂 | 碳纤维 | PI薄膜 | 特种陶瓷原料


    一、价格概览表

    | 材料 | 当前价格区间 | 周环比 | 趋势方向 |

    |——|————-|——–|———-|

    | PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒) | 30,000–48,000 元/吨 | -2.1% | ↘ 弱势下行 |

    | PTFE分散树脂 | 60,000–65,000 元/吨 | -1.5% | ↘ 偏弱整理 |

    | PEEK树脂(国产工业级) | 400–500 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 区间稳定 |

    | PEEK树脂(进口工业级) | 800–1,000 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 僵持整理 |

    | 碳纤维(T300/24K) | 75–85 元/千克 | +1.2% | ↗ 底部微涨 |

    | 碳纤维(T700/12K) | 120–150 元/千克 | +0.8% | ↗ 触底企稳 |

    | PI薄膜(电子级) | 100–300 万元/吨 | 持平 | → 高位持稳 |

    | 氧化铝(≥98.5%) | 2,800–3,200 元/吨 | +0.5% | ↗ 小幅上探 |

    | 碳化硅(88%) | 5,500–6,500 元/吨 | 持平 | → 整理观望 |


    二、重点变动分析

    2.1 PTFE树脂 — 持续承压,接近周期底部

    价格区间: 悬浮中粒主流31,800元/吨(山东),处于近30天低点(30,000元/吨)附近

    周环比: -2.1%,延续弱势

    核心驱动:

    供给端: 山东某新产能项目7月中旬投产,行业整体开工率偏低但库存偏高,供应压力不减

    需求端: 下游化工/食品包装行业采购情绪低迷,按需小单为主,无明显增量

    成本端: 萤石、氢氟酸价格高位(萤石约3,781元/吨),成本托底效应存在,但支撑有限

    判断: 价格已接近部分企业现金流成本线,进一步下行空间有限,短期偏弱整理

    2.2 碳纤维 — 底部反转信号初现

    价格区间: T300/24K华东75元/千克,T700/12K约120–150元/千克

    周环比: +1.2%,近半年来首次转正

    核心驱动:

    政策催化: 低空经济(eVTOL/无人机)纳入”十五五”规划,碳纤维作为结构轻量化核心材料,需求预期升温

    供给出清: 行业连续亏损1年后,中小产能开始停产降负,供应边际收缩

    出口回暖: 2026年上半年碳纤维出口量同比增幅明显,海外需求好于预期

    判断: 底部确立,但供大于求格局未根本扭转,反弹空间受制于库存高度;T700以上小丝束优先受益

    2.3 PI薄膜 — 高位持稳,景气延续

    价格区间: 电子级PI薄膜100–300万元/吨(厚度/规格差异显著)

    周环比: 持平

    核心驱动:

    供需格局: 国内高端PI薄膜严重依赖进口(杜邦/宇部/钟渊/韩SK),国产替代仍处早期阶段,供给弹性不足

    需求支撑: 半导体封装、柔性显示、5G高频通信等高端应用持续放量,需求增速保持15%以上

    技术壁垒: 全球仅少数企业具备量产能力,短期无新增大规模有效产能

    判断: 强势格局延续,国产化提速但短期难改进口依赖,高端型号价格仍有上行动力

    2.4 PEEK树脂 — 国产替代压制进口价格

    价格区间: 国产工业级400–500元/公斤,进口威格斯等800–1,000元/公斤

    周环比: 持平,进口端略有松动

    核心驱动:

    国产扩产: 中研股份、君华特塑等国内厂商持续扩产,国产与进口价差收窄

    需求分化: 工业级供需趋松;医疗/航空航天级因认证门槛高,价格坚挺

    判断: 普通工业级价格进入下行通道;建议锁定航空航天/医疗级PEEK的稳定供应商

    2.5 特种陶瓷原料 — 成本推动型小幅上涨

    价格区间: 氧化铝≥98.5%约2,800–3,200元/吨;碳化硅88%约5,500–6,500元/吨

    周环比: 氧化铝+0.5%,其余持平

    核心驱动:

    – 氧化铝上涨主因铝土矿成本上移;碳化硅受硅质原料价格平稳压制

    – 下游特种陶瓷/精密陶瓷需求稳增,但原料端整体涨幅温和

    判断: 成本推动型小幅上涨,预计8月维持稳中有升态势


    三、影响分析

    3.1 对采购成本的影响

    | 材料 | 当前采购影响 | 短期展望 |

    |——|————-|———|

    | PTFE树脂 | 低位采购窗口期,短期成本可控 | 继续下行空间有限,建议逢低适量补库 |

    | PEEK树脂(工业级) | 国产货源性价比优势扩大 | 工业级可优先采购国产,节省成本20–30% |

    | 碳纤维 | 历史低位,T300级采购成本友好 | 底部信号出现,可适当锁定T700长单 |

    | PI薄膜 | 高成本项目,建议提前锁量 | 供应偏紧,建议提前3个月备货 |

    | 特种陶瓷原料 | 成本温和上行,影响有限 | 适量储备氧化铝,关注稀土原料波动 |

    3.2 对供应链的影响

    PTFE: 供应过剩,买方议价能力增强,但低价可能刺激新增替代应用

    碳纤维: 底部反转预期下,供应链存在阶段性补库需求,物流周转可能加速

    PI薄膜/PEEK: 高端牌号供应仍以进口为主,需关注汇率波动和地缘物流风险

    特种陶瓷: 国产化率提升中,供应链自主可控性逐步改善


    四、行动建议

    ✅ 建议锁定价格的材料

    1. 碳纤维(T700/12K): 底部反转信号已现,下游低空经济需求预期升温,建议锁定3–6个月长单,锁定成本

    2. PI薄膜(电子级): 供应偏紧格局短期难改,建议提前锁定供应商配额,尤其面向半导体/柔性显示客户

    3. PEEK树脂(航空航天/医疗级): 认证周期长、供应商稀缺,建议签订年度框架协议

    ⏳ 建议观望的材料

    1. PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒/分散树脂): 价格处于下行周期底部,但供过于求格局未变,观望2–4周确认止跌信号后再批量补库

    2. 特种陶瓷原料: 小幅波动,库存周期保持2–3周即可,无需大规模囤货


    五、宏观信号监测

    原油价格: WTI约79–84美元/桶(7月底大幅下跌,中东地缘风险降温),化工品成本支撑边际减弱

    萤石/氢氟酸: 高位运行,PTFE成本支撑仍在,但力度有限

    汇率: 人民币汇率若走强,进口高端材料(PI/PEEK/碳纤维)采购成本将有所改善


    本报告基于公开市场数据整理,仅供参考。实际采购决策请结合企业自身库存、账期及供应商关系综合判断。

    市场情报官 | 新材料价格趋势监控
    日期: 2026-07-30

    .Trim() + ‘

    }) -join ”

    $trCells = ($bodyLines | ForEach-Object {

    $cells = (

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂 | PEEK树脂 | 碳纤维 | PI薄膜 | 特种陶瓷原料


    一、价格概览表

    | 材料 | 当前价格区间 | 周环比 | 趋势方向 |

    |——|————-|——–|———-|

    | PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒) | 30,000–48,000 元/吨 | -2.1% | ↘ 弱势下行 |

    | PTFE分散树脂 | 60,000–65,000 元/吨 | -1.5% | ↘ 偏弱整理 |

    | PEEK树脂(国产工业级) | 400–500 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 区间稳定 |

    | PEEK树脂(进口工业级) | 800–1,000 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 僵持整理 |

    | 碳纤维(T300/24K) | 75–85 元/千克 | +1.2% | ↗ 底部微涨 |

    | 碳纤维(T700/12K) | 120–150 元/千克 | +0.8% | ↗ 触底企稳 |

    | PI薄膜(电子级) | 100–300 万元/吨 | 持平 | → 高位持稳 |

    | 氧化铝(≥98.5%) | 2,800–3,200 元/吨 | +0.5% | ↗ 小幅上探 |

    | 碳化硅(88%) | 5,500–6,500 元/吨 | 持平 | → 整理观望 |


    二、重点变动分析

    2.1 PTFE树脂 — 持续承压,接近周期底部

    价格区间: 悬浮中粒主流31,800元/吨(山东),处于近30天低点(30,000元/吨)附近

    周环比: -2.1%,延续弱势

    核心驱动:

    供给端: 山东某新产能项目7月中旬投产,行业整体开工率偏低但库存偏高,供应压力不减

    需求端: 下游化工/食品包装行业采购情绪低迷,按需小单为主,无明显增量

    成本端: 萤石、氢氟酸价格高位(萤石约3,781元/吨),成本托底效应存在,但支撑有限

    判断: 价格已接近部分企业现金流成本线,进一步下行空间有限,短期偏弱整理

    2.2 碳纤维 — 底部反转信号初现

    价格区间: T300/24K华东75元/千克,T700/12K约120–150元/千克

    周环比: +1.2%,近半年来首次转正

    核心驱动:

    政策催化: 低空经济(eVTOL/无人机)纳入”十五五”规划,碳纤维作为结构轻量化核心材料,需求预期升温

    供给出清: 行业连续亏损1年后,中小产能开始停产降负,供应边际收缩

    出口回暖: 2026年上半年碳纤维出口量同比增幅明显,海外需求好于预期

    判断: 底部确立,但供大于求格局未根本扭转,反弹空间受制于库存高度;T700以上小丝束优先受益

    2.3 PI薄膜 — 高位持稳,景气延续

    价格区间: 电子级PI薄膜100–300万元/吨(厚度/规格差异显著)

    周环比: 持平

    核心驱动:

    供需格局: 国内高端PI薄膜严重依赖进口(杜邦/宇部/钟渊/韩SK),国产替代仍处早期阶段,供给弹性不足

    需求支撑: 半导体封装、柔性显示、5G高频通信等高端应用持续放量,需求增速保持15%以上

    技术壁垒: 全球仅少数企业具备量产能力,短期无新增大规模有效产能

    判断: 强势格局延续,国产化提速但短期难改进口依赖,高端型号价格仍有上行动力

    2.4 PEEK树脂 — 国产替代压制进口价格

    价格区间: 国产工业级400–500元/公斤,进口威格斯等800–1,000元/公斤

    周环比: 持平,进口端略有松动

    核心驱动:

    国产扩产: 中研股份、君华特塑等国内厂商持续扩产,国产与进口价差收窄

    需求分化: 工业级供需趋松;医疗/航空航天级因认证门槛高,价格坚挺

    判断: 普通工业级价格进入下行通道;建议锁定航空航天/医疗级PEEK的稳定供应商

    2.5 特种陶瓷原料 — 成本推动型小幅上涨

    价格区间: 氧化铝≥98.5%约2,800–3,200元/吨;碳化硅88%约5,500–6,500元/吨

    周环比: 氧化铝+0.5%,其余持平

    核心驱动:

    – 氧化铝上涨主因铝土矿成本上移;碳化硅受硅质原料价格平稳压制

    – 下游特种陶瓷/精密陶瓷需求稳增,但原料端整体涨幅温和

    判断: 成本推动型小幅上涨,预计8月维持稳中有升态势


    三、影响分析

    3.1 对采购成本的影响

    | 材料 | 当前采购影响 | 短期展望 |

    |——|————-|———|

    | PTFE树脂 | 低位采购窗口期,短期成本可控 | 继续下行空间有限,建议逢低适量补库 |

    | PEEK树脂(工业级) | 国产货源性价比优势扩大 | 工业级可优先采购国产,节省成本20–30% |

    | 碳纤维 | 历史低位,T300级采购成本友好 | 底部信号出现,可适当锁定T700长单 |

    | PI薄膜 | 高成本项目,建议提前锁量 | 供应偏紧,建议提前3个月备货 |

    | 特种陶瓷原料 | 成本温和上行,影响有限 | 适量储备氧化铝,关注稀土原料波动 |

    3.2 对供应链的影响

    PTFE: 供应过剩,买方议价能力增强,但低价可能刺激新增替代应用

    碳纤维: 底部反转预期下,供应链存在阶段性补库需求,物流周转可能加速

    PI薄膜/PEEK: 高端牌号供应仍以进口为主,需关注汇率波动和地缘物流风险

    特种陶瓷: 国产化率提升中,供应链自主可控性逐步改善


    四、行动建议

    ✅ 建议锁定价格的材料

    1. 碳纤维(T700/12K): 底部反转信号已现,下游低空经济需求预期升温,建议锁定3–6个月长单,锁定成本

    2. PI薄膜(电子级): 供应偏紧格局短期难改,建议提前锁定供应商配额,尤其面向半导体/柔性显示客户

    3. PEEK树脂(航空航天/医疗级): 认证周期长、供应商稀缺,建议签订年度框架协议

    ⏳ 建议观望的材料

    1. PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒/分散树脂): 价格处于下行周期底部,但供过于求格局未变,观望2–4周确认止跌信号后再批量补库

    2. 特种陶瓷原料: 小幅波动,库存周期保持2–3周即可,无需大规模囤货


    五、宏观信号监测

    原油价格: WTI约79–84美元/桶(7月底大幅下跌,中东地缘风险降温),化工品成本支撑边际减弱

    萤石/氢氟酸: 高位运行,PTFE成本支撑仍在,但力度有限

    汇率: 人民币汇率若走强,进口高端材料(PI/PEEK/碳纤维)采购成本将有所改善


    本报告基于公开市场数据整理,仅供参考。实际采购决策请结合企业自身库存、账期及供应商关系综合判断。

    市场情报官 | 新材料价格趋势监控
    日期: 2026-07-30

    -split ‘\|’ | Where-Object {

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂 | PEEK树脂 | 碳纤维 | PI薄膜 | 特种陶瓷原料


    一、价格概览表

    | 材料 | 当前价格区间 | 周环比 | 趋势方向 |

    |——|————-|——–|———-|

    | PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒) | 30,000–48,000 元/吨 | -2.1% | ↘ 弱势下行 |

    | PTFE分散树脂 | 60,000–65,000 元/吨 | -1.5% | ↘ 偏弱整理 |

    | PEEK树脂(国产工业级) | 400–500 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 区间稳定 |

    | PEEK树脂(进口工业级) | 800–1,000 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 僵持整理 |

    | 碳纤维(T300/24K) | 75–85 元/千克 | +1.2% | ↗ 底部微涨 |

    | 碳纤维(T700/12K) | 120–150 元/千克 | +0.8% | ↗ 触底企稳 |

    | PI薄膜(电子级) | 100–300 万元/吨 | 持平 | → 高位持稳 |

    | 氧化铝(≥98.5%) | 2,800–3,200 元/吨 | +0.5% | ↗ 小幅上探 |

    | 碳化硅(88%) | 5,500–6,500 元/吨 | 持平 | → 整理观望 |


    二、重点变动分析

    2.1 PTFE树脂 — 持续承压,接近周期底部

    价格区间: 悬浮中粒主流31,800元/吨(山东),处于近30天低点(30,000元/吨)附近

    周环比: -2.1%,延续弱势

    核心驱动:

    供给端: 山东某新产能项目7月中旬投产,行业整体开工率偏低但库存偏高,供应压力不减

    需求端: 下游化工/食品包装行业采购情绪低迷,按需小单为主,无明显增量

    成本端: 萤石、氢氟酸价格高位(萤石约3,781元/吨),成本托底效应存在,但支撑有限

    判断: 价格已接近部分企业现金流成本线,进一步下行空间有限,短期偏弱整理

    2.2 碳纤维 — 底部反转信号初现

    价格区间: T300/24K华东75元/千克,T700/12K约120–150元/千克

    周环比: +1.2%,近半年来首次转正

    核心驱动:

    政策催化: 低空经济(eVTOL/无人机)纳入”十五五”规划,碳纤维作为结构轻量化核心材料,需求预期升温

    供给出清: 行业连续亏损1年后,中小产能开始停产降负,供应边际收缩

    出口回暖: 2026年上半年碳纤维出口量同比增幅明显,海外需求好于预期

    判断: 底部确立,但供大于求格局未根本扭转,反弹空间受制于库存高度;T700以上小丝束优先受益

    2.3 PI薄膜 — 高位持稳,景气延续

    价格区间: 电子级PI薄膜100–300万元/吨(厚度/规格差异显著)

    周环比: 持平

    核心驱动:

    供需格局: 国内高端PI薄膜严重依赖进口(杜邦/宇部/钟渊/韩SK),国产替代仍处早期阶段,供给弹性不足

    需求支撑: 半导体封装、柔性显示、5G高频通信等高端应用持续放量,需求增速保持15%以上

    技术壁垒: 全球仅少数企业具备量产能力,短期无新增大规模有效产能

    判断: 强势格局延续,国产化提速但短期难改进口依赖,高端型号价格仍有上行动力

    2.4 PEEK树脂 — 国产替代压制进口价格

    价格区间: 国产工业级400–500元/公斤,进口威格斯等800–1,000元/公斤

    周环比: 持平,进口端略有松动

    核心驱动:

    国产扩产: 中研股份、君华特塑等国内厂商持续扩产,国产与进口价差收窄

    需求分化: 工业级供需趋松;医疗/航空航天级因认证门槛高,价格坚挺

    判断: 普通工业级价格进入下行通道;建议锁定航空航天/医疗级PEEK的稳定供应商

    2.5 特种陶瓷原料 — 成本推动型小幅上涨

    价格区间: 氧化铝≥98.5%约2,800–3,200元/吨;碳化硅88%约5,500–6,500元/吨

    周环比: 氧化铝+0.5%,其余持平

    核心驱动:

    – 氧化铝上涨主因铝土矿成本上移;碳化硅受硅质原料价格平稳压制

    – 下游特种陶瓷/精密陶瓷需求稳增,但原料端整体涨幅温和

    判断: 成本推动型小幅上涨,预计8月维持稳中有升态势


    三、影响分析

    3.1 对采购成本的影响

    | 材料 | 当前采购影响 | 短期展望 |

    |——|————-|———|

    | PTFE树脂 | 低位采购窗口期,短期成本可控 | 继续下行空间有限,建议逢低适量补库 |

    | PEEK树脂(工业级) | 国产货源性价比优势扩大 | 工业级可优先采购国产,节省成本20–30% |

    | 碳纤维 | 历史低位,T300级采购成本友好 | 底部信号出现,可适当锁定T700长单 |

    | PI薄膜 | 高成本项目,建议提前锁量 | 供应偏紧,建议提前3个月备货 |

    | 特种陶瓷原料 | 成本温和上行,影响有限 | 适量储备氧化铝,关注稀土原料波动 |

    3.2 对供应链的影响

    PTFE: 供应过剩,买方议价能力增强,但低价可能刺激新增替代应用

    碳纤维: 底部反转预期下,供应链存在阶段性补库需求,物流周转可能加速

    PI薄膜/PEEK: 高端牌号供应仍以进口为主,需关注汇率波动和地缘物流风险

    特种陶瓷: 国产化率提升中,供应链自主可控性逐步改善


    四、行动建议

    ✅ 建议锁定价格的材料

    1. 碳纤维(T700/12K): 底部反转信号已现,下游低空经济需求预期升温,建议锁定3–6个月长单,锁定成本

    2. PI薄膜(电子级): 供应偏紧格局短期难改,建议提前锁定供应商配额,尤其面向半导体/柔性显示客户

    3. PEEK树脂(航空航天/医疗级): 认证周期长、供应商稀缺,建议签订年度框架协议

    ⏳ 建议观望的材料

    1. PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒/分散树脂): 价格处于下行周期底部,但供过于求格局未变,观望2–4周确认止跌信号后再批量补库

    2. 特种陶瓷原料: 小幅波动,库存周期保持2–3周即可,无需大规模囤货


    五、宏观信号监测

    原油价格: WTI约79–84美元/桶(7月底大幅下跌,中东地缘风险降温),化工品成本支撑边际减弱

    萤石/氢氟酸: 高位运行,PTFE成本支撑仍在,但力度有限

    汇率: 人民币汇率若走强,进口高端材料(PI/PEEK/碳纤维)采购成本将有所改善


    本报告基于公开市场数据整理,仅供参考。实际采购决策请结合企业自身库存、账期及供应商关系综合判断。

    市场情报官 | 新材料价格趋势监控
    日期: 2026-07-30

    .Trim() -ne ” } | ForEach-Object {

    ‘ +

    2026-07-30 新材料价格趋势日报

    发布时间: 2026年7月30日
    监测范围: PTFE树脂 | PEEK树脂 | 碳纤维 | PI薄膜 | 特种陶瓷原料


    一、价格概览表

    | 材料 | 当前价格区间 | 周环比 | 趋势方向 |

    |——|————-|——–|———-|

    | PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒) | 30,000–48,000 元/吨 | -2.1% | ↘ 弱势下行 |

    | PTFE分散树脂 | 60,000–65,000 元/吨 | -1.5% | ↘ 偏弱整理 |

    | PEEK树脂(国产工业级) | 400–500 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 区间稳定 |

    | PEEK树脂(进口工业级) | 800–1,000 元/公斤 | 持平 | → 僵持整理 |

    | 碳纤维(T300/24K) | 75–85 元/千克 | +1.2% | ↗ 底部微涨 |

    | 碳纤维(T700/12K) | 120–150 元/千克 | +0.8% | ↗ 触底企稳 |

    | PI薄膜(电子级) | 100–300 万元/吨 | 持平 | → 高位持稳 |

    | 氧化铝(≥98.5%) | 2,800–3,200 元/吨 | +0.5% | ↗ 小幅上探 |

    | 碳化硅(88%) | 5,500–6,500 元/吨 | 持平 | → 整理观望 |


    二、重点变动分析

    2.1 PTFE树脂 — 持续承压,接近周期底部

    价格区间: 悬浮中粒主流31,800元/吨(山东),处于近30天低点(30,000元/吨)附近

    周环比: -2.1%,延续弱势

    核心驱动:

    供给端: 山东某新产能项目7月中旬投产,行业整体开工率偏低但库存偏高,供应压力不减

    需求端: 下游化工/食品包装行业采购情绪低迷,按需小单为主,无明显增量

    成本端: 萤石、氢氟酸价格高位(萤石约3,781元/吨),成本托底效应存在,但支撑有限

    判断: 价格已接近部分企业现金流成本线,进一步下行空间有限,短期偏弱整理

    2.2 碳纤维 — 底部反转信号初现

    价格区间: T300/24K华东75元/千克,T700/12K约120–150元/千克

    周环比: +1.2%,近半年来首次转正

    核心驱动:

    政策催化: 低空经济(eVTOL/无人机)纳入”十五五”规划,碳纤维作为结构轻量化核心材料,需求预期升温

    供给出清: 行业连续亏损1年后,中小产能开始停产降负,供应边际收缩

    出口回暖: 2026年上半年碳纤维出口量同比增幅明显,海外需求好于预期

    判断: 底部确立,但供大于求格局未根本扭转,反弹空间受制于库存高度;T700以上小丝束优先受益

    2.3 PI薄膜 — 高位持稳,景气延续

    价格区间: 电子级PI薄膜100–300万元/吨(厚度/规格差异显著)

    周环比: 持平

    核心驱动:

    供需格局: 国内高端PI薄膜严重依赖进口(杜邦/宇部/钟渊/韩SK),国产替代仍处早期阶段,供给弹性不足

    需求支撑: 半导体封装、柔性显示、5G高频通信等高端应用持续放量,需求增速保持15%以上

    技术壁垒: 全球仅少数企业具备量产能力,短期无新增大规模有效产能

    判断: 强势格局延续,国产化提速但短期难改进口依赖,高端型号价格仍有上行动力

    2.4 PEEK树脂 — 国产替代压制进口价格

    价格区间: 国产工业级400–500元/公斤,进口威格斯等800–1,000元/公斤

    周环比: 持平,进口端略有松动

    核心驱动:

    国产扩产: 中研股份、君华特塑等国内厂商持续扩产,国产与进口价差收窄

    需求分化: 工业级供需趋松;医疗/航空航天级因认证门槛高,价格坚挺

    判断: 普通工业级价格进入下行通道;建议锁定航空航天/医疗级PEEK的稳定供应商

    2.5 特种陶瓷原料 — 成本推动型小幅上涨

    价格区间: 氧化铝≥98.5%约2,800–3,200元/吨;碳化硅88%约5,500–6,500元/吨

    周环比: 氧化铝+0.5%,其余持平

    核心驱动:

    – 氧化铝上涨主因铝土矿成本上移;碳化硅受硅质原料价格平稳压制

    – 下游特种陶瓷/精密陶瓷需求稳增,但原料端整体涨幅温和

    判断: 成本推动型小幅上涨,预计8月维持稳中有升态势


    三、影响分析

    3.1 对采购成本的影响

    | 材料 | 当前采购影响 | 短期展望 |

    |——|————-|———|

    | PTFE树脂 | 低位采购窗口期,短期成本可控 | 继续下行空间有限,建议逢低适量补库 |

    | PEEK树脂(工业级) | 国产货源性价比优势扩大 | 工业级可优先采购国产,节省成本20–30% |

    | 碳纤维 | 历史低位,T300级采购成本友好 | 底部信号出现,可适当锁定T700长单 |

    | PI薄膜 | 高成本项目,建议提前锁量 | 供应偏紧,建议提前3个月备货 |

    | 特种陶瓷原料 | 成本温和上行,影响有限 | 适量储备氧化铝,关注稀土原料波动 |

    3.2 对供应链的影响

    PTFE: 供应过剩,买方议价能力增强,但低价可能刺激新增替代应用

    碳纤维: 底部反转预期下,供应链存在阶段性补库需求,物流周转可能加速

    PI薄膜/PEEK: 高端牌号供应仍以进口为主,需关注汇率波动和地缘物流风险

    特种陶瓷: 国产化率提升中,供应链自主可控性逐步改善


    四、行动建议

    ✅ 建议锁定价格的材料

    1. 碳纤维(T700/12K): 底部反转信号已现,下游低空经济需求预期升温,建议锁定3–6个月长单,锁定成本

    2. PI薄膜(电子级): 供应偏紧格局短期难改,建议提前锁定供应商配额,尤其面向半导体/柔性显示客户

    3. PEEK树脂(航空航天/医疗级): 认证周期长、供应商稀缺,建议签订年度框架协议

    ⏳ 建议观望的材料

    1. PTFE树脂(悬浮中粒/分散树脂): 价格处于下行周期底部,但供过于求格局未变,观望2–4周确认止跌信号后再批量补库

    2. 特种陶瓷原料: 小幅波动,库存周期保持2–3周即可,无需大规模囤货


    五、宏观信号监测

    原油价格: WTI约79–84美元/桶(7月底大幅下跌,中东地缘风险降温),化工品成本支撑边际减弱

    萤石/氢氟酸: 高位运行,PTFE成本支撑仍在,但力度有限

    汇率: 人民币汇率若走强,进口高端材料(PI/PEEK/碳纤维)采购成本将有所改善


    本报告基于公开市场数据整理,仅供参考。实际采购决策请结合企业自身库存、账期及供应商关系综合判断。

    市场情报官 | 新材料价格趋势监控
    日期: 2026-07-30

    .Trim() + ‘

    }) -join ”

    ‘ + $cells + ‘

    }) -join ”

    ‘ + $thCells + ‘‘ + $trCells + ‘

    新材料价格趋势监控

    日期: 2026-07-30

  • Boletim Diário de Palavras-chave de Novos Materiais (30/07/2026): PEEK rumo a 60% de nacionalização, PTFE CCL e aerogel em alta

    1. Conclusões principais

    • PEEK: a palavra-chave mais quente. O 15º Plano Quinquenal da China exige mais de 60% de nacionalização em 2026; a demanda é impulsionada por robôs humanoides (~6,5 kg de PEEK por unidade) e pelo canal acelerado de aprovação de implantes ortopédicos de PEEK. A demanda doméstica deve crescer de 2.334 t (2022) para 5.079 t (2027), CAGR de ~16,8%.
    • PTFE: o interesse de busca migra para laminados revestidos de cobre (CCL) de PTFE. Vendas globais previstas em US$ 2,0 bilhões em 2026, com CAGR de ~9,2% até 2032, puxadas por substratos de alta frequência para IA.
    • Aerogel: em ponto de inflexão, do nicho à comercialização em escala. Mercado global estimado em ~US$ 1,9 bilhão em 2026 (CAGR ~9,5% até 2032), impulsionado pelo isolamento térmico de baterias de veículos elétricos e pela eficiência energética em edificações.
    • Produtos químicos eletrônicos: forte impulso de políticas públicas. Sete ministérios chineses destacaram os químicos eletrônicos como área-chave; somente a fabricação de circuitos integrados na China demandará mais de 1,1 milhão de toneladas de químicos eletrônicos úmidos em 2026.
    • Fibra de carbono: interesse estável. Energia eólica, economia de baixa altitude e aeroespacial seguem como temas principais; o foco migra para redução de custos e absorção da capacidade de large-tow.
    • Cerâmicas especiais: avanços em substratos de SiC elevam as palavras-chave relacionadas. Substratos condutores de SiC de 8 polegadas produzidos na China viraram destaque, com a nacionalização de semicondutores de potência em fase decisiva.

    2. Avaliação de calor e concorrência das palavras-chave

    Palavra-chave Calor Concorrência Tendência Driver
    PEEK robô humanoide ★★★★★ Média ↑ Subindo rápido Produção em massa de robôs + política de nacionalização
    Laminado de cobre PTFE ★★★★ Baixa-média ↑ Subindo Substratos de alta frequência para servidores de IA
    Aerogel isolamento de bateria ★★★★ Média ↑ Subindo Normas de segurança de VEs mais rígidas
    Químicos eletrônicos úmidos ★★★★ Média ↑ Subindo Expansão de fábricas + substituição de importações
    Substrato cerâmico SiC ★★★★ Média-alta ↑ Subindo Avanço doméstico de 8 polegadas
    Compósitos de fibra de carbono ★★★ Alta → Estável Eólica / economia de baixa altitude

    3. Ações recomendadas

    1. Prioridades de conteúdo: produzir primeiro conteúdos sobre “PEEK + robôs humanoides” e “PTFE CCL + substratos de IA” — a concorrência ainda não está saturada; é uma janela de tráfego.
    2. Entrada por cauda longa: em aerogel, evitar termos genéricos; focar em caudas longas de aplicação como “isolamento térmico de pacote de baterias” e “manta de aerogel de fibra cerâmica”.
    3. Ganchos de política: vincular o conteúdo de químicos eletrônicos ao plano chinês de crescimento petroquímico e às palavras-chave do 15º Plano Quinquenal de novos materiais.

    Fontes: QYResearch, Gongyan, Frost & Sullivan, Asiachem, relatórios setoriais públicos. Gerado automaticamente pelo Oficial de Inteligência de Mercado.